Pharmaceutical Communication in Spain around the COVID-19 Crisis: A Scoping Review
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/135271
Título: | Pharmaceutical Communication in Spain around the COVID-19 Crisis: A Scoping Review |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Ibáñez-Hernández, Ana Isabel | Papí-Gálvez, Natalia | Carretón-Ballester, Carmen |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Relaciones Públicas, Responsabilidad Social y Comunicación con Públicos Especializados y Las Minorías | Grupo de Estudios sobre Comunicación Estratégica (E-COM) |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Comunicación y Psicología Social |
Palabras clave: | Pharmaceutical communication | Health literacy | Digital society | Coronavirus | Information overload | Scoping review | PRISMA |
Fecha de publicación: | 16-jun-2023 |
Editor: | MDPI |
Cita bibliográfica: | Ibáñez-Hernández A, Papí-Gálvez N, Carretón-Ballester C. Pharmaceutical Communication in Spain around the COVID-19 Crisis: A Scoping Review. Systems. 2023; 11(6):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11060309 |
Resumen: | This paper addresses the scientific production of pharmaceutical communication in Spain around the COVID-19 crisis, in which information overload, amplified by the digital media, evidenced the relevance of communication in the digital society. The research observes the evolution and characteristics of such studies, identifying scientific fields and disciplines related to communication, thematic lines, agents and publics. To this end, it proposes an exploratory review study adjusted to the PRISMA protocol with a search strategy including three databases (Scopus, WOS and Dialnet) and whose filtration produced a final population of 56 publications on Spanish pharmaceutical communication between 2018 and 2022. The results point to a greater production of scientific papers around the year of the pandemic. These papers were published by university institutions in health sciences journals, although differences in authorship by gender were detected. Most of them are empirical papers, with a predominance of mixed content analyses. The field of public relations stands out, but terminological confusion was also detected. This leads to a reflection on its causes and solutions in favour of the transparency and accountability in pharmaceutical communication. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/135271 |
ISSN: | 2079-8954 |
DOI: | 10.3390/systems11060309 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos: | © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11060309 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - RPRSS - Artículos de Revistas INV - E-COM - Artículos de Revistas |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ibanez-Hernandez_etal_2023_Systems.pdf | 2,23 MB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Vista previa | |
Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.