Daily variation of fishing effort and ex-vessel prices in a western Mediterranean multi-species fishery: Implications for sustainable management
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/48897
Título: | Daily variation of fishing effort and ex-vessel prices in a western Mediterranean multi-species fishery: Implications for sustainable management |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Samy-Kamal, Mohamed | Forcada, Aitor | Sánchez-Lizaso, José Luis |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Biología Marina | Recursos Hídricos y Desarrollo Sostenible |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ciencias del Mar y Biología Aplicada |
Palabras clave: | Effort reduction | Ex-vessel price | Fishery management | Métiers | Trawl fishery | Value of landings |
Área/s de conocimiento: | Zoología |
Fecha de publicación: | nov-2015 |
Editor: | Elsevier |
Cita bibliográfica: | Marine Policy. 2015, 61: 187-195. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.08.015 |
Resumen: | The daily variation of fishing effort and ex-vessel price was analysed to determine which day of the week is suitable to ban the fishery, as an alternative management measure to the one month seasonal closure. Thus, 10-years landings data were used from two representative trawling ports of the western Mediterranean: Dénia and La Vila Joiosa. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect significant differences in fishing effort (total and by métier) and daily ex-vessel price of the main target species. Also, the economic loss produced by banning one day (the proposed measure) was compared to economic loss produced by the seasonal closure (the actual measure). Daily variation in the fishing effort was observed in La Vila Joiosa mainly due to higher effort at the end of the week devoted on crustacean métiers, while effort was similar among days in Dénia. The lowest mean prices for most target species were on Tuesday and Wednesday, and were higher on Monday and Friday. Banning one day per week (Tuesday or Wednesday), when market prices of target species are lower would reduce the double of effort than one month of seasonal closure, and likely without subsidies. However, the loss by banning all Wednesdays (approx. 50 days) was higher in both ports than one month, but lower than an equivalent two months closure. |
Patrocinador/es: | M. Samy-Kamal was supported by a grant of the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID) MAEC-AECID (Nº0000593564). |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/48897 |
ISSN: | 0308-597X (Print) | 1872-9460 (Online) |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.08.015 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos: | © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.08.015 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - BM - Artículos Científicos / Scientific Papers INV - Recursos Hídricos y Desarrollo Sostenible - Artículos de Revistas |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samy_Kamal_et_al-2015_Marine_Policy.pdf | Versión final (acceso restringido) | 1,89 MB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Solicitar una copia |
Samy_Kamal_et_al-2015_Marine_Policy_rev.pdf | Versión revisada (acceso abierto) | 1,06 MB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Vista previa |
Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.