Modeling the optimal management of land subsidence due to aquifers overexploitation

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/138286
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Modeling the optimal management of land subsidence due to aquifers overexploitation
Autor/es: Esteban, Encarna | Dinar, Ariel | Calvo, Elena | Albiac, Jose | Calatrava, Javier | Herrera García, Gerardo | Teatini, Pietro | Tomás, Roberto | Ezquerro, Pablo | Li, Yang
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Ingeniería del Terreno y sus Estructuras (InTerEs)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil
Palabras clave: Land subsidence | Groundwater | Water overdraft | Two-stage optimization | Pontryagin backward-solving problem | Alto guadaletín aquifer system
Fecha de publicación: 27-oct-2023
Editor: Elsevier
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Environmental Management. 2023, 349: 119333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119333
Resumen: The study of land subsidence has recently been expanded due to its increased occurrence and magnitude worldwide. This paper develops and applies an optimal control model of groundwater extractions under conditions of land subsidence. We include, in a traditional groundwater management model, two types of negative externalities associated with land subsidence: damage to infrastructure and to economic activities, and the loss of aquifer storage capacity. Using a two-stage optimal control method, characterized by two sub-problems corresponding to the phase before and after the occurrence of subsidence, we find the economically sustainable paths of groundwater extractions and water table levels under the existence of land subsidence impacts. The theoretical results indicate that the presence of land subsidence dictates the optimal paths of groundwater withdrawals and water table levels. The model has been applied to the Alto Guadalentín over-exploited aquifer system in the Segura River Basin of Spain. The empirical outcomes indicate that by following the optimal paths, groundwater extractions should be curtailing to avoid reaching the critical water level at which subsidence takes place. Results suggest that regional net present value of welfare over the planning period, under the two land subsidence scenarios, is reduced by nearly 1–5%, compared to the no land subsidence scenario. Furthermore, under subsidence, even with relatively small impacts of both types of externalities, groundwater optimal extractions are kept at levels that avoid these externalities. These outcomes clearly call for government intervention in order to reduce groundwater withdrawals in aquifers with propensity to face undesirable subsidence effects.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/138286
ISSN: 0301-4797 (Print) | 1095-8630 (Online)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119333
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2023 Elsevier Ltd.
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119333
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - INTERES - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailEsteban_etal_2023_JEnvironManag_final.pdf3,03 MBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.