Comparing sagittal heights calculated using corneal parameters and those measured with profilometry

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/126181
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Comparing sagittal heights calculated using corneal parameters and those measured with profilometry
Autor/es: Rojas Viñuela, Javier | Piñero, David P. | Burgos Martínez, Mercedes
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Grupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía
Palabras clave: Ocular sagittal height | Profilometer | Soft contact lens | Corneal eccentricity | Corneal curvature | Corneal diameter
Fecha de publicación: 22-ago-2022
Editor: Elsevier
Cita bibliográfica: Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2023, 46(2): 101747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2022.101747
Resumen: Purpose: To compare the sagittal height of the anterior eye (OC-SAG) calculated using corneal parameters with the OC-SAG measured by profilometry. Method: Seventy right eyes of soft contact lens wearers measured with the ESP (Eaglet Eye, The Netherlands) after lens removal were retrospectively analyzed for this study. The OC-SAG of the eyes was calculated using mean k-values, eccentricity and the inner (corneal) radius obtained with the ESP for an 11-mm cord diameter. It was then extrapolated to chord diameters of 14, 14.5 and 15 mm. These values were compared with OC-SAG values obtained with the ESP for the same chord diameters. Additionally, the OC-SAG was calculated through the formula used by a lab that manufactures custom soft lenses (mark’ennovy, Madrid, Spain) and compared again with the values obtained using the ESP. Results: Differences between calculated OC-SAG obviating the shape factor were 121 ± 44, 155 ± 105, 172 ± 117 and 189 ± 129 µm for chord diameters of 11, 14, 14.5 and 15 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). When the shape factor was included in the calculation, differences were 28 ± 48, 62 ± 102, 79 ± 113 and 96 ± 123 µm (p < 0.001). When the inner best fit sphere was used to estimate OC-SAG, differences were 34 ± 11, 0 ± 72, 17 ± 86 and 34 ± 99, respectively, with no significant differences for the 14 and 14.5 mm-chord diameters (p = 0.99 and 0.11, respectively). Correlation coefficients between OC-SAG calculated and measured OC-SAG ranged from 0.53 to 0.90 depending on the chord diameter used. When the mark’ennovy formula was used to calculate the OC-SAG as the lens diameter proposed by the formula, the difference was −47 ± 147 µm (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Differences between the OC-SAG calculated using corneal parameters and that measured with a profilometer are statistically and clinically significant, especially for large chord diameters. The impact of this on contact lens fitting should be addressed in future studies.
Patrocinador/es: The author David P. Piñero was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness within the Ramón y Cajal program, RYC-2016-20471.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/126181
ISSN: 1367-0484 (Print) | 1476-5411 (Online)
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101747
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Contact Lens Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2022.101747
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailRojas-Vinuela_etal_2023_ContactLensAnterEye.pdf3,25 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons