Carbamazepine and Diclofenac Removal Double Treatment: Oxidation and Adsorption

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/116631
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Carbamazepine and Diclofenac Removal Double Treatment: Oxidation and Adsorption
Autor/es: Aldeguer, Alejandro | Varó Galvañ, Pedro José | Sentana Gadea, Irene | Prats, Daniel
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Recursos Hídricos y Desarrollo Sostenible
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ingeniería Química | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Expresión Gráfica, Composición y Proyectos | Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Universitario del Agua y las Ciencias Ambientales
Palabras clave: Carbamazepine | Diclofenac | Powdered activated carbon | Ozone
Área/s de conocimiento: Ingeniería Química | Expresión Gráfica en la Ingeniería
Fecha de publicación: 4-jul-2021
Editor: MDPI
Cita bibliográfica: Aldeguer Esquerdo A, Varo Galvañ PJ, Sentana Gadea I, Prats Rico D. Carbamazepine and Diclofenac Removal Double Treatment: Oxidation and Adsorption. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(13):7163. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137163
Resumen: In the present research, the effect of two hybrid treatments, ozone followed by powdered activated carbon (PAC) or PAC followed by ozone (O3), was studied for the removal of two drugs present in water: diclofenac and carbamazepine. In the study, two initial concentrations of each of the contaminants, 0.7 mg L−1 and 1.8 mg L−1, were used. Different doses of PAC between 4–20 mg L−1 were studied as variables, as well as different doses of O3 between 0.056–0.280 mg L−1. The evolution of the concentration of each contaminant over time was evaluated. From the results obtained, it was concluded that the combined treatment with ozone followed by PAC reduces between 50% and 75% the time required to achieve 90% removal of diclofenac when compared with the time required when only activated carbon was used. In the case of carbamazepine, the time required was 97% less. For carbamazepine, to achieve reduction percentages of up to 90%, O3 treatment followed by PAC acted faster than PAC followed by O3. In the case of diclofenac, PAC treatment followed by O3 was faster to reach concentrations of up to 90%. However, to reach yields below 80%, O3 treatment followed by PAC was more efficient.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/116631
ISSN: 1660-4601
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137163
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137163
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - Recursos Hídricos y Desarrollo Sostenible - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailAldeguer-Esquerdo_etal_2021_IntJEnvironResPublicHealth.pdf2,4 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons