The effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/96287
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: The effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews
Autor/es: Hillier-Brown, Frances | Thomson, Katie | Mcgowan, Victoria | Cairns, Joanne | Eikemo, Terje A. | Gil-González, Diana | Bambra, Clare
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Salud Pública
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia
Palabras clave: Social policy | Gender | Labour market | Health equity | Review | Evidence
Área/s de conocimiento: Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública
Fecha de publicación: 2019
Editor: SAGE Publications
Cita bibliográfica: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2019, 47(6): 655-665. doi:10.1177/1403494819848276
Resumen: Background: The welfare state distributes financial resources to its citizens – protecting them in times of adversity. Variations in how such social protection policies are administered have been attributed to important differences in population health. The aim of this systematic review of reviews is to update and appraise the evidence base of the effects of social protection policies on health inequalities. Methods/design: Systematic review methodology was used. Nine databases were searched from 2007 to 2017 for reviews of social policy interventions in high-income countries. Quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 tool. Results: Six systematic reviews were included in our review, reporting 50 unique primary studies. Two reviews explored income maintenance and poverty relief policies and found some, low quality, evidence that increased unemployment benefit generosity may improve population mental health. Four reviews explored active labour-market policies and found some, low-quality evidence, that return to work initiatives may lead to short-term health improvements, but that in the longer term, they can lead to declines in mental health. The more rigorously conducted reviews found no significant health effects of any of social protection policy under investigation. No reviews of family policies were located. Conclusions: The systematic review evidence base of the effects of social protection policy interventions remains sparse, of low quality, of limited generalizability (as the evidence base is concentrated in the Anglo-Saxon welfare state type), and relatively inconclusive. There is a clear need for evaluations in more diverse welfare state settings and particularly of family policies.
Patrocinador/es: This article is part of the HiNEWS project – Health Inequalities in European Welfare States funded by the NORFACE (New Opportunities for Research Funding Agency Cooperation in Europe) Welfare State Futures programme (grant reference: 462-14-110). For more details on NORFACE see www.norface.net/11.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/96287
ISSN: 1403-4948 (Print) | 1651-1905 (Online)
DOI: 10.1177/1403494819848276
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © Author(s) 2019
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494819848276
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - SP - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2019_Hillier-Brown_etal_ScandJPublicHealth_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)501,79 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia
Thumbnail2019_Hillier-Brown_etal_ScandJPublicHealth_preprint.pdfPreprint (acceso abierto)1,46 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.