The effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/96287
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: The effects of social protection policies on health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews
Authors: Hillier-Brown, Frances | Thomson, Katie | Mcgowan, Victoria | Cairns, Joanne | Eikemo, Terje A. | Gil-González, Diana | Bambra, Clare
Research Group/s: Salud Pública
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia
Keywords: Social policy | Gender | Labour market | Health equity | Review | Evidence
Knowledge Area: Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Citation: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2019, 47(6): 655-665. doi:10.1177/1403494819848276
Abstract: Background: The welfare state distributes financial resources to its citizens – protecting them in times of adversity. Variations in how such social protection policies are administered have been attributed to important differences in population health. The aim of this systematic review of reviews is to update and appraise the evidence base of the effects of social protection policies on health inequalities. Methods/design: Systematic review methodology was used. Nine databases were searched from 2007 to 2017 for reviews of social policy interventions in high-income countries. Quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 tool. Results: Six systematic reviews were included in our review, reporting 50 unique primary studies. Two reviews explored income maintenance and poverty relief policies and found some, low quality, evidence that increased unemployment benefit generosity may improve population mental health. Four reviews explored active labour-market policies and found some, low-quality evidence, that return to work initiatives may lead to short-term health improvements, but that in the longer term, they can lead to declines in mental health. The more rigorously conducted reviews found no significant health effects of any of social protection policy under investigation. No reviews of family policies were located. Conclusions: The systematic review evidence base of the effects of social protection policy interventions remains sparse, of low quality, of limited generalizability (as the evidence base is concentrated in the Anglo-Saxon welfare state type), and relatively inconclusive. There is a clear need for evaluations in more diverse welfare state settings and particularly of family policies.
Sponsor: This article is part of the HiNEWS project – Health Inequalities in European Welfare States funded by the NORFACE (New Opportunities for Research Funding Agency Cooperation in Europe) Welfare State Futures programme (grant reference: 462-14-110). For more details on NORFACE see www.norface.net/11.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/96287
ISSN: 1403-4948 (Print) | 1651-1905 (Online)
DOI: 10.1177/1403494819848276
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © Author(s) 2019
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494819848276
Appears in Collections:INV - SP - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thumbnail2019_Hillier-Brown_etal_ScandJPublicHealth_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)501,79 kBAdobe PDFOpen    Request a copy
Thumbnail2019_Hillier-Brown_etal_ScandJPublicHealth_preprint.pdfPreprint (acceso abierto)1,46 MBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.