Pharmaceutical Communication in Spain around the COVID-19 Crisis: A Scoping Review

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/135271
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Pharmaceutical Communication in Spain around the COVID-19 Crisis: A Scoping Review
Autor/es: Ibáñez-Hernández, Ana Isabel | Papí-Gálvez, Natalia | Carretón-Ballester, Carmen
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Relaciones Públicas, Responsabilidad Social y Comunicación con Públicos Especializados y Las Minorías | Grupo de Estudios sobre Comunicación Estratégica (E-COM)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Comunicación y Psicología Social
Palabras clave: Pharmaceutical communication | Health literacy | Digital society | Coronavirus | Information overload | Scoping review | PRISMA
Fecha de publicación: 16-jun-2023
Editor: MDPI
Cita bibliográfica: Ibáñez-Hernández A, Papí-Gálvez N, Carretón-Ballester C. Pharmaceutical Communication in Spain around the COVID-19 Crisis: A Scoping Review. Systems. 2023; 11(6):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11060309
Resumen: This paper addresses the scientific production of pharmaceutical communication in Spain around the COVID-19 crisis, in which information overload, amplified by the digital media, evidenced the relevance of communication in the digital society. The research observes the evolution and characteristics of such studies, identifying scientific fields and disciplines related to communication, thematic lines, agents and publics. To this end, it proposes an exploratory review study adjusted to the PRISMA protocol with a search strategy including three databases (Scopus, WOS and Dialnet) and whose filtration produced a final population of 56 publications on Spanish pharmaceutical communication between 2018 and 2022. The results point to a greater production of scientific papers around the year of the pandemic. These papers were published by university institutions in health sciences journals, although differences in authorship by gender were detected. Most of them are empirical papers, with a predominance of mixed content analyses. The field of public relations stands out, but terminological confusion was also detected. This leads to a reflection on its causes and solutions in favour of the transparency and accountability in pharmaceutical communication.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/135271
ISSN: 2079-8954
DOI: 10.3390/systems11060309
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11060309
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - RPRSS - Artículos de Revistas
INV - E-COM - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailIbanez-Hernandez_etal_2023_Systems.pdf2,23 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.