Abundance and Temporal Distribution of Beach Litter on the Coast of Ceuta (North Africa, Gibraltar Strait)

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/118785
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Abundance and Temporal Distribution of Beach Litter on the Coast of Ceuta (North Africa, Gibraltar Strait)
Autor/es: Asensio-Montesinos, Francisco | Anfuso, Giorgio | Aguilar-Torrelo, María Teresa | Oliva Ramírez, Milagrosa
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio "Ramón Margalef"
Palabras clave: Beach typology | Clean Coast Index (CCI) | Coastal pollution | Harmful litter | Litter grade | Mediterranean | Marine debris | Plastic | Polymer | Sewage-related debris
Área/s de conocimiento: Ecología
Fecha de publicación: 2-oct-2021
Editor: MDPI
Cita bibliográfica: Asensio-Montesinos F, Anfuso G, Aguilar-Torrelo MT, Oliva Ramírez M. Abundance and Temporal Distribution of Beach Litter on the Coast of Ceuta (North Africa, Gibraltar Strait). Water. 2021; 13(19):2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192739
Resumen: Twelve beaches located in Ceuta (Spain) were studied from February to April 2019 to assess litter amounts (expressed as number of items), categories and temporal distribution. At each beach, three surveys were conducted, i.e., one per month (i.e., 36 in total). Selected beaches covered urban (7), rural (2) and remote (3) bathing areas. Plastic represented the dominant material, i.e., 35.2% of all debris, followed by glass (18.2%), pottery/ceramics (14.6%), wood (11.4%), metal (11.4%), paper/cardboard (4.8%), cloth (3.5%), rubber (0.7%), organic (0.3%) and other materials (0.1%). The Clean Coast Index was calculated to classify beaches in five categories for evaluating the cleanliness level of the coast observed at each survey: “Very Clean” (7 surveys), “Clean” (10), “Moderately Dirty” (8), “Dirty” (2) and “Extremely Dirty” (9). Litter occurrence was assessed by the Litter Grade methodology, which allowed to classify beaches in four grades: “A”: very good (0); “B”: good (4); “C”: fair (7); and “D”: poor (25). In a few surveys, some beaches were considered “good”, but their management should not be ignored because in other surveys those beaches reached fair and poor scores. Several potentially harmful litter items were related to beach users. Severe eastern storms removed litter at many of the beaches investigated and favored accumulation at others. Data analysis shows significant differences in litter abundance with respect to site, beach typology and the presence of cleaning operations but no important differences between the studied months. Rural beaches recorded the most litter, followed by urban and remote beaches. All beaches require immediate and more appropriate management actions to improve their environmental status.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/118785
ISSN: 2073-4441
DOI: 10.3390/w13192739
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192739
Aparece en las colecciones:Personal Investigador sin Adscripción a Grupo

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailAsensio-Montesinos_etal_2021_Water.pdf4,56 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons