ADHD and Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Comparing Executive Functioning Response Patterns

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/118068
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: ADHD and Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Comparing Executive Functioning Response Patterns
Autor/es: Collado-Valero, Joshua | Navarro Soria, Ignasi | Delgado, Beatriz | Real Fernández, Marta | Costa-López, Borja | Mazón Esquiva, Isabel | Lavigne Cerván, Rocio
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Grupo de Investigación en Psicología Evolutiva y Criminología (GIPEC) | Habilidades, Competencias e Instrucción
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y Didáctica | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Psicología de la Salud
Palabras clave: Executive functions | ADHD | SCT | BDEFS-CA | Response patterns | Sustainable assessment | Differential diagnosis
Área/s de conocimiento: Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación | Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico
Fecha de publicación: 22-sep-2021
Editor: MDPI
Cita bibliográfica: Collado-Valero J, Navarro-Soria I, Delgado-Domenech B, Real-Fernández M, Costa-López B, Mazón-Esquiva I, Lavigne-Cerván R. ADHD and Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Comparing Executive Functioning Response Patterns. Sustainability. 2021; 13(19):10506. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910506
Resumen: The aim of the present study was to describe and compare the specific profiles of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) through the Hybrid Model of Executive Functioning (HMEF). The total sample of 1049 subjects, aged 6 to 18 years (M = 10.75; SD = 3.20), were classified into a non-pathologic group, an ADHD group and an SCT group, and assessed using the short version of the Barkley Deficit in Executive Functions Scale for Children and Adolescents (BDEFS-CA). The results revealed significant differences between the three groups in all executive domains (non-pathologic < SCT < ADHD). While the ADHD group demonstrated a consistently high profile of difficulties in each subscale, the SCT group showed an irregular profile of difficulties, with middle and low scores, depending on the executive function. Although the SCT group’s score was far away from the ADHD group’s score for Self-Motivation, Emotions Self-Regulation and Self-Restraint and Inhibition, the two groups’ scores were very close for Time Self-Management and Self-Organization and Problem Solving. Accordingly, through logistic regression analyses, the SCT group was exclusively related to these last two executive domains; however, the ADHD group was strongly associated with almost every executive function. The findings suggest that the short version of the BDEFS-CA discriminates between both disorders, supporting psycho-pedagogical assessment and differential diagnosis.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/118068
ISSN: 2071-1050
DOI: 10.3390/su131910506
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910506
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - Habilidades, Competencias e Instrucción - Artículos de Revistas
INV - GIPEC - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailCollado-Valero_etal_2021_Sustainability.pdf390,86 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons