Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/123153
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review
Autor/es: Orlik, Witold | Aleo, Giuseppe | Kearns, Thomas | Briody, Jonathan | Wray, Jane | Mahon, Paul | Gazić, Mario | Radoš, Normela | García Vivar, Cristina | Lillo-Crespo, Manuel | Fitzgerald, Catherine
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Person-centred Care and Health Outcomes Innovation / Atención centrada en la persona e innovación en resultados de salud (PCC-HOI)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería
Palabras clave: Continuing professional development | Economic evaluation | Health professions education
Área/s de conocimiento: Enfermería
Fecha de publicación: 21-abr-2022
Editor: Association for the Study of Medical Education | John Wiley & Sons
Cita bibliográfica: Medical Education. 2022, 56(10): 972-982. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14813
Resumen: CONTEXT: Continuing Professional Development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimization of patient safety and person-centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD. METHODS: This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit, and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021. RESULTS: Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70), half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38), and healthcare professionals’ knowledge gain (n = 19). CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/123153
ISSN: 0308-0110 (Print) | 1365-2923 (Online)
DOI: 10.1111/medu.14813
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2022 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14813
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - PCC-HOI - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailOrlik_etal_2022_MedEdu.pdf451,27 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons