Perfectionism, Motives, and Barriers to Exercise from a Person-Oriented Approach

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/117191
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Perfectionism, Motives, and Barriers to Exercise from a Person-Oriented Approach
Autor/es: Vicent, María | Sanmartín, Ricardo | Gonzálvez, Carolina | Vásconez-Rubio, Oswaldo | García-Fernández, José Manuel
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Investigación en Inteligencias, Competencia Social y Educación (SOCEDU)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y Didáctica
Palabras clave: Perfectionism | Participation motives | Barriers | Exercise
Área/s de conocimiento: Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación | Didáctica y Organización Escolar
Fecha de publicación: 31-jul-2021
Editor: MDPI
Cita bibliográfica: Vicent M, Sanmartín R, Gonzálvez C, Vásconez-Rubio O, García-Fernández JM. Perfectionism, Motives, and Barriers to Exercise from a Person-Oriented Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(15):8125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158125
Resumen: Perfectionism is considered to be a significant personality factor within the sport and exercise field. However, very little is known about the reasons why individuals with different perfectionistic tendencies engage or not in physical activity. This study aims, from a person-oriented approach, to analyze if participation motives and barriers may differ among four perfectionistic profiles: Non-Perfectionists (low perfectionistic strivings, PS, and perfectionistic concerns, PC), Adaptive Perfectionists (high PS and low PC), Maladaptive Perfectionists (high PS and PC), and Moderate Perfectionists (moderate PS and PC). A sample composed of 597 (Mage = 22.08, SD = 3.33) undergraduates enrolled in a sport science degree from Ecuador participated in this study. Non-Perfectionists reported lower levels of motives, whereas Adaptive and Maladaptive Perfectionists reported higher scores on all participation motives. Significant and positive correlations were found between PS and both autonomous and controlled motives, whereas PC was positively correlated with controlled reasons and only significantly correlated with some autonomous reasons by the effect of PS. In terms of barriers, Maladaptive Perfectionists reported significantly higher scores on all barriers analyzed in comparison with the other three profiles, with moderate and large effect sizes. The results of the bivariate and partial correlations suggest that these inter-profile differences were explained by PC. Considering the results, it is advised to develop strategies to identify Maladaptive Perfectionists in order to increase their intrinsic reasons for practicing physical exercise, and to minimize their perceived barriers.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/117191
ISSN: 1660-4601
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18158125
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158125
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - SOCEDU - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailVicent_etal_2021_IntJEnvironResPublicHealth.pdf729,03 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons