Emotional Regulation Mechanisms of University Students in Group Work Situations

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/142075
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Emotional Regulation Mechanisms of University Students in Group Work Situations
Autor/es: Vega Ramírez, Lilyan | Reyno Freundt, Alda | Hederich Martínez, Christian | Ávalos Ramos, María Alejandra
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Innovation in Physical Education and Physical Activity and Sport (EDUCAPHYS)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas
Palabras clave: Motivation | Abilities | Collaborative work | Social skills | Higher education
Fecha de publicación: 2-abr-2024
Editor: MDPI
Cita bibliográfica: European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2024, 14(4): 902-912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14040058
Resumen: Universities are active agents of social change through knowledge, providing citizens with the necessary abilities to face professional challenges. This work aims to evaluate and analyse the adaptation of emotional regulation in learning situations of group work in virtual and hybrid (virtual and presential) environments, of a group of students of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences belonging to a Chilean university and a Spanish university. Method: A total of 107 students from a Chilean university and a Spanish university, all of them enrolled in the degree in Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, participated in the study. The instrument used was the Adaptative Instrument for Regulation of Emotions questionnaire. Results: The analysis of the data shows that there are some significant differences (p ≤ 0.05), between the groups of students who worked virtually and those who worked in hybrid situations, in the aspects related to personal motivations (learn from my classmates, not to disappoint my working group, and enjoying the experience of working in a group). The students who worked online resolved conflicts mainly through individual regulation mechanisms with significant differences in relation to the students who worked in hybrid mode. No significant differences were found in the socioemotional challenges or in the balance of the metacognitive experience. Conclusion: The group that worked in hybrid learning valued group purposes over personal purposes and used the social regulation mechanism over individual regulation in conflict resolution. On the other hand, the group that worked virtually valued group and personal purposes equally and used the mechanism of individual regulation and social regulation to solve difficulties. Differences between students who worked in virtual and hybrid environments may be due to greater social interaction and group dynamics in hybrid environments, as well as differences in culture and access to resources and technology.
Patrocinador/es: This research has been funded by the Redes-I3CE Program for Research in University Teaching, Institute of Educational Sciences of the University of Alicante (call 2021-22). Ref: [W5632].
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/142075
ISSN: 2254-9625
DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe14040058
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14040058
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - EDUCAPHYS - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailVega-Ramirez_etal_2024_EurJInvestigHealthPsycholEduc.pdf306,4 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.