How Social are Flood Risk Management Plans in Spain?

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/116828
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: How Social are Flood Risk Management Plans in Spain?
Autor/es: Ortiz, Guadalupe | Aznar-Crespo, Pablo | Olcina-Sala, Ángela
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Población, Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo (POMADE)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Sociología I
Palabras clave: Disaster | Natural hazard | Social capacities | Risk governance | Non-structural measures | Stakeholder | Science-policy gap | Social vulnerability
Área/s de conocimiento: Sociología
Fecha de publicación: 2021
Editor: WIT Press
Cita bibliográfica: WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 2021, 251: 65-75. https://doi.org/10.2495/WS210071
Resumen: Due to the weaknesses of the technocratic model in providing integrated, sustainable flood risk management, a new approach has emerged aimed at promoting adaptive strategies by means of non-structural measures, such as raising awareness among exposed populations and improving their adaptive response to risk. However, the emerging nature of these measures makes it necessary to analyse the way in which this social approach is being implemented in the day-to-day practice of flood risk management. Thus the aim of this paper is to assess the integration of social actions of risk response and public participation into risk management processes. To this end, 14 Spanish flood risk management plans (FRMPs) were reviewed and codified by means of a documentary content analysis. The coding process was designed according to the models of social capacity building and participatory assessment in flood risk management. The resulting analysis provided information on the characteristics of participatory processes in the development of FRMPs and on five areas of social initiatives for capacity building: knowledge, financing, motivation, governance and networks. The results revealed the limited quality of participatory processes due to procedural weaknesses and low representation of social actors. Also, social actions were focused on the promotion of risk awareness and showed a lack of technical detail that reduced their potential for implementation. Thus this paper argues that the social approach has not been transferred to practice in flood risk management, since the development of measures is still predominantly shaped by the traditional technocratic approach.
Patrocinador/es: This study was carried out within the framework of the National Programme for University Teacher Training (FPU) of the Spanish Universities Ministry and funded by a grant awarded to the second author of the paper.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/116828
ISSN: 1743-3541
DOI: 10.2495/WS210071
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2021 WIT Press
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.2495/WS210071
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - POMADE - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailOrtiz_etal_2021_WIT-TEE.pdf267,96 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.