Could anatomical changes occurring with cataract surgery have a clinically significant effect on effective intraocular lens position?

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/114690
Registro completo de metadatos
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributorGrupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFukumitsu, Hideki-
dc.contributor.authorCamps, Vicent J.-
dc.contributor.authorMiraflores, Sara-
dc.contributor.authorPiñero, David P.-
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T09:09:32Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-04T09:09:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Ophthalmology. 2021, 41: 1895-1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01751-yes_ES
dc.identifier.issn1573-2630-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/114690-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess if the calculation of the effective lens position (ELP) of two different monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) could be optimized by considering the potential anatomical changes occurring after cataract surgery. Methods: Prospective, descriptive, single-center study involving 472 eyes of 280 subjects (mean age 73.5 years) undergoing cataract surgery that were divided into two groups according to the IOL implanted: group 1330 eyes with AcrySof IQ SN60WF (Alcon), and group 2142 eyes with Akreos MI60L (Bausch + Lomb). Refractive and biometric changes were evaluated during a period of 6-month follow-up with an optical biometer (considering potential measurement artifacts). Comparison of ELP estimated with the SRK-T formula (ELPSRK-T) and ELP calculated considering clinical real data was made (ELPAXL-corrected clinical). Results: Besides significant changes in refraction (p ≤ 0.020), a significant increase in anterior chamber depth (ACD) (p < 0.001) and a significant reduction in the axial length (AXL) (p < 0.001) were detected at 1 month after surgery. Mean 1-month postoperative AXL change was − 0.08 ± 0.06 and − 0.10 ± 0.11 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.001), with no significant changes afterward. Mean difference between ELPSRK-T and ELPAXL-corrected clinical was 0.17 ± 0.39 and − 0.23 ± 0.43 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). A strong and statistically significant correlation of these differences with the prediction refractive error was found in both groups (group 1, r =  − 0.723; group 2, r =  − 0.819; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The estimation of ELP using the SRK-T formula for the two IOLs evaluated may be optimized considering biometric changes with surgery, helping to understand better some problems of refractive unpredictability.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author David P Piñero has been supported by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness of Spain within the program Ramón y Cajal, RYC-2016–20471.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.rights© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021es_ES
dc.subjectIOL power calculationes_ES
dc.subjectSRK-Tes_ES
dc.subjectEffective lens positiones_ES
dc.subjectAxial lengthes_ES
dc.subjectCataract surgeryes_ES
dc.subject.otherÓpticaes_ES
dc.titleCould anatomical changes occurring with cataract surgery have a clinically significant effect on effective intraocular lens position?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.peerreviewedsies_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10792-021-01751-y-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01751-yes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/RYC-2016-20471-
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailFukumitsu_etal_2021_IntOphthalmol_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)457,62 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.