“Here Are the Rules: Ignore All Rules”: Automatic Contradiction Detection in Spanish

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/113915
Registro completo de metadatos
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributorProcesamiento del Lenguaje y Sistemas de Información (GPLSI)es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSepúlveda-Torres, Robiert-
dc.contributor.authorBonet-Jover, Alba-
dc.contributor.authorSaquete Boró, Estela-
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Alicante. Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticoses_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Alicante. Instituto Universitario de Investigación Informáticaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-31T08:50:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-31T08:50:20Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-30-
dc.identifier.citationSepúlveda-Torres R, Bonet-Jover A, Saquete E. “Here Are the Rules: Ignore All Rules”: Automatic Contradiction Detection in Spanish. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(7):3060. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073060es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/113915-
dc.description.abstractThis paper tackles automatic detection of contradictions in Spanish within the news domain. Two pieces of information are classified as compatible, contradictory, or unrelated information. To deal with the task, the ES-Contradiction dataset was created. This dataset contains a balanced number of each of the three types of information. The novelty of the research is the fine-grained annotation of the different types of contradictions in the dataset. Presently, four different types of contradictions are covered in the contradiction examples: negation, antonyms, numerical, and structural. However, future work will extend the dataset with all possible types of contradictions. In order to validate the effectiveness of the dataset, a pretrained model is used (BETO), and after performing different experiments, the system is able to detect contradiction with a F1m of 92.47%. Regarding the type of contradictions, the best results are obtained with negation contradiction (F1m = 98%), whereas structural contradictions obtain the lowest results (F1m = 69%) because of the smaller number of structural examples, due to the complexity of generating them. When dealing with a more generalistic dataset such as XNLI, our dataset fails to detect most of the contradictions properly, as the size of both datasets are very different and our dataset only covers four types of contradiction. However, using the classification of the contradictions leads us to conclude that there are highly complex contradictions that will need external knowledge in order to be properly detected and this will avoid the need for them to be previously exposed to the system.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research work has been partially funded by Generalitat Valenciana through project “SIIA: Tecnologias del lenguaje humano para una sociedad inclusiva, igualitaria, y accesible” with grant reference PROMETEU/2018/089, by the Spanish Government through project RTI2018-094653-B-C22: “Modelang: Modeling the behavior of digital entities by Human Language Technologies”, as well as being partially supported by a grant from the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) and the LIVING-LANG project (RTI2018-094653-B-C21) from the Spanish Government.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).es_ES
dc.subjectContradiction detectiones_ES
dc.subjectNatural language processinges_ES
dc.subjectDeep learninges_ES
dc.subjectHuman language technologieses_ES
dc.subject.otherLenguajes y Sistemas Informáticoses_ES
dc.title“Here Are the Rules: Ignore All Rules”: Automatic Contradiction Detection in Spanishes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.peerreviewedsies_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app11073060-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app11073060es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-094653-B-C22-
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-094653-B-C21-
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GPLSI - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailSepulveda-Torres_etal_2021_ApplSci.pdf275,15 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons