Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy
Empreu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest ítem
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/9631
Registre complet
Camp Dublin Core | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Salud Pública | en |
dc.contributor.author | Cacho-Martínez, Pilar | - |
dc.contributor.author | García-Muñoz, Ángel | - |
dc.contributor.author | García Bernabeu, José R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | López Navarro, Alberto | - |
dc.contributor.other | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-02-16T07:55:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-02-16T07:55:48Z | - |
dc.date.created | 1998-04 | - |
dc.date.issued | 1999-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | CACHO MARTÍNEZ, Pilar, et al. "Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy". Optometry and Vision Science. Vol. 76, No. 9 (Sept. 1999). ISSN 1040-5488, pp. 650-655 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1040-5488 (Print) | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1538-9235 (Online) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/9631 | - |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare MEM dynamic retinoscopy with the Nott method, to discover whether there were different results in the accommodative response and whether a relation exists between the two techniques. METHODS: We performed MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy in 50 visually normal university students. Both methods were performed first on the basis of static retinoscopy and second with the result of the subjective refractive exam (binocular balancing). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference existed between the methods. Nott retinoscopy assessed on basis of the subjective refractive exam was the method that obtained the lowest amounts of accommodative lag (+0.42 D), whereas MEM method performed through the static retinoscopy result showed the highest accommodative lag (+0.94 D). Furthermore, correlation analysis showed that a linear relation existed between both methods, so that the Nott value was about one-half the value of the MEM retinoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: MEM dynamic retinoscopy showed greater lag than Nott retinoscopy. | en |
dc.language | eng | en |
dc.publisher | American Academy of Optometry | en |
dc.publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins | en |
dc.subject | Accommodative response | en |
dc.subject | Accommodative lag | en |
dc.subject | Accommodative lead | en |
dc.subject | Dynamic retinoscopy | en |
dc.subject | Monocular estimate method | en |
dc.subject | Nott retinoscopy | en |
dc.subject.other | Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública | en |
dc.subject.other | Óptica | en |
dc.title | Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy | en |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | en |
dc.peerreviewed | si | en |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
Apareix a la col·lecció: | INV - SP - Artículos de Revistas |
Arxius per aquest ítem:
Arxiu | Descripció | Tamany | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison between MEM and Nott Dynamic Retinoscopy.pdf | 531,17 kB | Adobe PDF | Obrir Vista prèvia | |
Tots els documents dipositats a RUA estan protegits per drets d'autors. Alguns drets reservats.