“Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/118681
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: “Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter
Authors: Llorca-Asensi, Elena | Sánchez, Alexander | Fabregat-Cabrera, Maria-Elena | Ruiz-Callado, Raúl
Research Group/s: Sociología de la Innovación y del Cambio Social (SOC-INNOVA) | Lucentia | Observatorio Sociológico de la Educación (OBSOEDU) | Población, Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo (POMADE)
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Sociología I | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos
Keywords: Disinformation | Misinformation | Self-determination | Rights | Law | Polarization | Emotions | Catalonia | Twitter
Knowledge Area: Sociología | Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos
Issue Date: 13-Oct-2021
Publisher: MDPI
Citation: Llorca-Asensi E, Sanchez A, Fabregat-Cabrera M-E, Ruiz-Callado R. “Why Can’t We?” Disinformation and Right to Self-Determination. The Catalan Conflict on Twitter. Social Sciences. 2021; 10(10):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10100383
Abstract: Disinformation does not always take the form of a fake news item, it also appears in much less evident formats which are subtly filtered into public opinion, thus making its detection more difficult. A method is proposed in this paper to address the study of “widespread” disinformation by combining social science methods with artificial intelligence and text mining. The case study chosen was the expression “right of self-determination” as a generator of disinformation within the context of the Catalan independence process. The main work hypothesis was that the (intentional or unintentional) confusion around the meaning and scope of this right has become widely extended within the population, generating negative emotions which favour social polarisation. The method utilised had three stages: (1) Description of the disinformation elements surrounding the term with the help of experts; (2) Detection of these elements within a corpus of tweets; (3) Identification of the emotions expressed in the corpus. The results show that the disinformation described by experts clearly dominates the conversation about “self-determination” on Twitter and is associated with a highly negative emotional load in which contempt, hatred, and frustration prevail.
Sponsor: This research was financed with the grant of the deputy vice-chancellor’s office Program for Research and Knowledge Transfer, for the promotion of R&D&I, at the University of Alicante, Modality B: Aids for the financing of R&D&I projects which give rise to a doctoral thesis with an “Industrial Doctorate” mention.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/118681
ISSN: 2076-0760
DOI: 10.3390/socsci10100383
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10100383
Appears in Collections:INV - LUCENTIA - Artículos de Revistas
INV - OBSOEDU - Artículos de Revistas
INV - PMD - Artículos de Revistas
INV - SOC-INNOVA - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailLlorca-Asensi_etal_2021_SocSci.pdf1,72 MBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.