González Lagier, Daniel
Is It Possible to Formulate a Precise and Objective Standard of Proof? Some Questions Based on an Argumentative Approach to Evidence
González Lagier, Daniel (2022). “Is It Possible to Formulate a Precise and Objective Standard of Proof? Some Questions Based on an Argumentative Approach to Evidence”. In: Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi; Vázquez, Carmen (Eds.). Evidential Legal Reasoning: Crossing Civil Law and Common Law Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-51699-7, pp. 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009032049.018
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/139346
DOI: 10.1017/9781009032049.018
ISSN: 
ISBN: 978-1-316-51699-7
Abstract: 
In this study, I adopt an argumentative perspective on evidence, focusing on three points: (1) The structure of evidentiary inference; (2) which reasons count as good ones for establishing the degree of corroboration of a hypothesis and (3) the possibility of formulating a precise, objective standard of proof.
Keywords:Legal Evidence, Legal argumentation, Rules of reasoned judgment, Standard of proof
Cambridge University Press
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart