Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/9631
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy
Authors: Cacho Martínez, Pilar | García Muñoz, Ángel | García Bernabeu, José R. | López Navarro, Alberto
Research Group/s: Salud Pública
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia
Keywords: Accommodative response | Accommodative lag | Accommodative lead | Dynamic retinoscopy | Monocular estimate method | Nott retinoscopy
Knowledge Area: Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública | Óptica
Date Created: Apr-1998
Issue Date: Sep-1999
Publisher: American Academy of Optometry | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Citation: CACHO MARTÍNEZ, Pilar, et al. "Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy". Optometry and Vision Science. Vol. 76, No. 9 (Sept. 1999). ISSN 1040-5488, pp. 650-655
Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare MEM dynamic retinoscopy with the Nott method, to discover whether there were different results in the accommodative response and whether a relation exists between the two techniques. METHODS: We performed MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy in 50 visually normal university students. Both methods were performed first on the basis of static retinoscopy and second with the result of the subjective refractive exam (binocular balancing). RESULTS: A statistically significant difference existed between the methods. Nott retinoscopy assessed on basis of the subjective refractive exam was the method that obtained the lowest amounts of accommodative lag (+0.42 D), whereas MEM method performed through the static retinoscopy result showed the highest accommodative lag (+0.94 D). Furthermore, correlation analysis showed that a linear relation existed between both methods, so that the Nott value was about one-half the value of the MEM retinoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: MEM dynamic retinoscopy showed greater lag than Nott retinoscopy.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/9631
ISSN: 1040-5488 (Print) | 1538-9235 (Online)
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Peer Review: si
Appears in Collections:INV - SP - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailComparison between MEM and Nott Dynamic Retinoscopy.pdf531,17 kBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.