Comparative Assessment of Goods and Services Provided by Grazing Regulation and Reforestation in Degraded Mediterranean Rangelands

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/66109
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Comparative Assessment of Goods and Services Provided by Grazing Regulation and Reforestation in Degraded Mediterranean Rangelands
Authors: Papanastasis, Vasilios P. | Bautista, Susana | Chouvardas, Dimitrios | Mantzanas, Konstantinos | Papadimitriou, Maria | Mayor, Angeles G. | Koukioumi, Polina | Papaioannou, Athanasios | Vallejo, V. Ramon
Research Group/s: Gestión de Ecosistemas y de la Biodiversidad (GEB)
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología | Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio "Ramón Margalef"
Keywords: Carbon sequestration | Ecosystem services | Forage | Grazing management | Landscape functional analysis | Plant diversity | Restoration actions | Soil functions
Knowledge Area: Ecología
Issue Date: May-2017
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Citation: Land Degradation & Development. 2017, 28(4): 1178-1187. doi:10.1002/ldr.2368
Abstract: Several management actions are applied to restore ecosystem services in degraded Mediterranean rangelands, which range from adjusting the grazing pressure to the removal of grazers and pine plantations. Four such actions were assessed in Quercus coccifera L. shrublands in northern Greece: (i) moderate grazing by goats and sheep; (ii) no grazing; (iii) no grazing plus pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) plantation in forest gaps (gap reforestation); and (iv) no grazing plus full reforestation of shrubland areas, also with P. pinaster. In addition, heavy grazing was also assessed to serve as a control action. We comparatively assessed the impact of these actions on key provisioning, regulating and supporting ecosystem services by using ground-based indicators. Depending on the ecosystem service considered, the management actions were ranked differently. However, the overall provision of services was particularly favoured under moderate and no grazing management options, with moderate grazing outranking any other action in provisioning services and the no grazing action presenting the most balanced provision of services. Pine reforestations largely contributed to water and soil conservation and C sequestration but had a negative impact on plant diversity when implemented at the expense of removing natural vegetation in the area. Heavy grazing had the lowest provision of ecosystem services. It is concluded that degraded rangelands can be restored by moderating the grazing pressure rather than completely banning livestock grazing or converting them into pine plantations.
Sponsor: This research is part of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and Support Action PRACTICE (Prevention and Restoration Actions to Combat Desertification: An Integrative assessment—grant agreement no. 226828). The research of S. B., A. G. M. and V. R. V. has received funding from the projects CASCADE (funded by EU-FP7; grant agreement no. 283068), GRACCIE (CSD2007-00067, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Innovation and Science, Consolider-Ingenio 2010 Program) and SFUN (CGL2011-30515-C02-00, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/66109
ISSN: 1085-3278 (Print) | 1099-145X (Online)
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2368
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2368
Appears in Collections:INV - GEB - Artículos de Revistas
Research funded by the EU
INV - DRYEX - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thumbnail2017_Papanastasis_etal_LandDegradDevelop_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)377,65 kBAdobe PDFOpen    Request a copy
Thumbnail2017_Papanastasis_etal_LandDegradDevelop_accepted.pdfAccepted Manuscript (acceso abierto)758,66 kBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.