Characterization of Visual Symptomatology Associated with Refractive, Accommodative, and Binocular Anomalies

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Characterization of Visual Symptomatology Associated with Refractive, Accommodative, and Binocular Anomalies
Authors: Cacho-Martínez, Pilar | Cantó-Cerdán, Mario | Carbonell Bonete, Stela | García-Muñoz, Ángel
Research Group/s: Salud Pública
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía
Keywords: Visual symptomatology | Refractive | Accommodative | Binocular anomalies
Knowledge Area: Óptica
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Citation: Journal of Ophthalmology. Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 895803, 13 pages. doi:10.1155/2015/895803
Abstract: Purpose. To characterize the symptomatology of refractive, accommodative, and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions and to assess the association between dysfunctions and symptoms. Methods. 175 randomised university students were examined. Subjects were given a subjective visual examination with accommodative and binocular tests, evaluating their symptomatology. Accommodative and binocular dysfunctions (AD, BD) were diagnosed according to the number of existing clinical signs: suspect AD or BD (one fundamental clinical sign), high suspect (one fundamental + 1 complementary clinical sign), and definite (one fundamental + 2 or more complementary clinical signs). A logistic regression was conducted in order to determine whether there was an association between dysfunctions and symptoms. Results. 78 subjects (44.6%) reported any kind of symptoms which were grouped into 18 categories, with “visual fatigue” being the most frequent (20% of the overall complaints). Logistic regression adjusted by the presence of an uncorrected refractive error showed no association between any grade of AD and symptoms. Subjects with BD had more likelihood of having symptoms than without dysfunction group (OR = 3.35), being greater when only definite BD were considered (OR = 8.79). Conclusions. An uncorrected refractive error is a confusion factor when considering AD symptomatology. For BD, the more the number of clinical signs used the greater the likelihood suffering symptoms.
Sponsor: This work has been supported by “Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación” of the University of Alicante, Spain, GRE10-06.
ISSN: 2090-004X (Print) | 2090-0058 (Online)
DOI: 10.1155/2015/895803
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2015 Pilar Cacho-Martínez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Peer Review: si
Publisher version:
Appears in Collections:INV - SP - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thumbnail2015_Cacho_etal_JOphthal.pdf1,3 MBAdobe PDFOpen Preview

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons