A comparison of the effect of two different judging systems on the technique selection of Muay Thai competitors

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/34419
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: A comparison of the effect of two different judging systems on the technique selection of Muay Thai competitors
Autor/es: Myers, Tony | Nevill, Alan | Al-Nakeeb, Yahya
Palabras clave: Notational analysis | Judging | Muay Thai | Technique selection
Área/s de conocimiento: Educación Física y Deportiva
Fecha de publicación: 2013
Editor: Universidad de Alicante. Área de Educación Física y Deporte
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2013, 8(3): 761-777. doi:10.4100/jhse.2013.83.01
Resumen: Growing internationalisation of the sport of Muay Thai has prompted a debate on which judging system should be implemented internationally; a western system very similar to boxing (used pre-2005 in the UK) or the system used in Thailand, the country of origin. This paper examined the possible impact on athlete performance of these two different judging systems. Notational analysis was conducted on fights involving competitors who have been judged exclusively using the pre 2005 UK judging system (N=16), and on fighters exclusively judged using the Thai judging system (N=16), to determine if these judging systems produced quantifiably different performances. Statistically significant differences were found between the groups. A Friedman’s ANOVA suggested that competitors judged using the Thai system were homogeneous in their technique selection using a similar pattern of techniques (p=0.14589), but that the competitors judged by the UK system were not (p=0.00277). Chi squared analysis suggested statistically differences across a range of variables including attacking techniques, defensive techniques, distancing, balance and effect. Fighters judged using the Thai system used more attacking and defensive techniques (p<0.001), had better distancing (p<0.001), balance (p<0.001), and a greater effect of their techniques (p<0.001). The study concluded that the judging system employed does have an impact on the performance given the differences found reflected different aspects of the judging criteria applied. In addition, the study found that the Thai judging system seemed to encourage competitors to use a greater number of more visually spectacular and effective techniques and as such may be more entertaining for spectators. Future research recommended included reanalysing fighters judged post 2005 in the UK where a system very similar to the Thai judging system has been implemented, along with the use of purposely-recorded footage.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/34419
ISSN: 1988-5202
DOI: 10.4100/jhse.2013.83.01
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2013.83.01
Aparece en las colecciones:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2013, Vol. 8, No. 3

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnailjhse_Vol_8_N_III_761-777.pdf1,45 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons