A comparison of the effect of two different judging systems on the technique selection of Muay Thai competitors

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/34419
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: A comparison of the effect of two different judging systems on the technique selection of Muay Thai competitors
Authors: Myers, Tony | Nevill, Alan | Al-Nakeeb, Yahya
Keywords: Notational analysis | Judging | Muay Thai | Technique selection
Knowledge Area: Educación Física y Deportiva
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Universidad de Alicante. Área de Educación Física y Deporte
Citation: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2013, 8(3): 761-777. doi:10.4100/jhse.2013.83.01
Abstract: Growing internationalisation of the sport of Muay Thai has prompted a debate on which judging system should be implemented internationally; a western system very similar to boxing (used pre-2005 in the UK) or the system used in Thailand, the country of origin. This paper examined the possible impact on athlete performance of these two different judging systems. Notational analysis was conducted on fights involving competitors who have been judged exclusively using the pre 2005 UK judging system (N=16), and on fighters exclusively judged using the Thai judging system (N=16), to determine if these judging systems produced quantifiably different performances. Statistically significant differences were found between the groups. A Friedman’s ANOVA suggested that competitors judged using the Thai system were homogeneous in their technique selection using a similar pattern of techniques (p=0.14589), but that the competitors judged by the UK system were not (p=0.00277). Chi squared analysis suggested statistically differences across a range of variables including attacking techniques, defensive techniques, distancing, balance and effect. Fighters judged using the Thai system used more attacking and defensive techniques (p<0.001), had better distancing (p<0.001), balance (p<0.001), and a greater effect of their techniques (p<0.001). The study concluded that the judging system employed does have an impact on the performance given the differences found reflected different aspects of the judging criteria applied. In addition, the study found that the Thai judging system seemed to encourage competitors to use a greater number of more visually spectacular and effective techniques and as such may be more entertaining for spectators. Future research recommended included reanalysing fighters judged post 2005 in the UK where a system very similar to the Thai judging system has been implemented, along with the use of purposely-recorded footage.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/34419
ISSN: 1988-5202
DOI: 10.4100/jhse.2013.83.01
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2013.83.01
Appears in Collections:Revistas - Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2013, Vol. 8, No. 3

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thumbnailjhse_Vol_8_N_III_761-777.pdf1,45 MBAdobe PDFOpen Preview

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons