Learning outcomes and cost-utility analysis of hybrid patient and mannequin-based simulation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/138140
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Learning outcomes and cost-utility analysis of hybrid patient and mannequin-based simulation
Authors: Perpiñá-Galvañ, Juana | Satorra-Rodríguez, Silvia | Gutiérrez García, Ana Isabel | García Aracil, Noelia | José-Alcaide, Lourdes | Montoro-Pérez, Néstor | Juliá-Sanchis, Rocío
Research Group/s: Person-centred Care and Health Outcomes Innovation / Atención centrada en la persona e innovación en resultados de salud (PCC-HOI) | Enfermería y Cultura de los Cuidados (EYCC) | Grupo de Investigación Integral en el Neurodesarrollo Típico y Atípico (GINTA)
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería
Keywords: Hybrid patient | Mannequin | Nursing students, simulation training/ economics
Issue Date: 24-Oct-2023
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Nurse Education Today. 2024, 132: 106003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106003
Abstract: Introduction: There is no clear evidence on the relationship between nursing student learning outcomes and the type of simulator used or its cost-effectiveness. Objectives: Compare nursing student learning outcomes using either the hybrid patient or mannequin and the cost-utility of both simulators. Method: A randomised experimental study with an experimental group (hybrid patient = 99) and a control group (mannequin = 97). A training intervention was carried out for polytrauma patients. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between the simulator used and the performance results for tourniquet (hybrid 5.37 ± 1.33, mannequin 4.95 ± 1.09; p = .008) and spinal board (hybrid 6.18 ± 2.02, mannequin 6.97 ± 20.2; p = .001) application. The cost-utility ratio was estimated to be 3.29 for the hybrid patient and 1.92 for the mannequin. Conclusion: The use of a hybrid patient or mannequin has not been shown to be a determinant of performance outcomes or student perceptions in training interventions in polytrauma patient care. However, as the cost per participant with a mannequin is almost twice as high, the hybrid patient has a better cost-utility ratio.
Sponsor: This work was supported by the University of Alicante, within the Programa de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria (Research in University Teaching Programme) 2022 (approval number: 5766).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/138140
ISSN: 0260-6917 (Print) | 1532-2793 (Online)
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106003
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106003
Appears in Collections:INV - GINTA - Artículos de Revistas
INV - PCC-HOI - Artículos de Revistas
INV - EYCC - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailPerpina-Galvan_etal_2024_NurseEducTod.pdf427,13 kBAdobe PDFOpen Preview

Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.