Benchmarking DFT Functionals for Excited-State Calculations of Donor–Acceptor TADF Emitters: Insights on the Key Parameters Determining Reverse Inter-System Crossing

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/134882
Full metadata record
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorQuímica Cuánticaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorHall, David-
dc.contributor.authorSancho-Garcia, Juan-Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorPershin, Anton-
dc.contributor.authorBeljonne, David-
dc.contributor.authorZysman-Colman, Eli-
dc.contributor.authorOlivier, Yoann-
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Alicante. Departamento de Química Físicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T10:38:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-05T10:38:39Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-17-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2023, 127(21): 4743-4757. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c08201es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1089-5639 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn1520-5215 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/134882-
dc.description.abstractThe importance of intermediate triplet states and the nature of excited states has gained interest in recent years for the thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) mechanism. It is widely accepted that simple conversion between charge transfer (CT) triplet and singlet excited states is too crude, and a more complex route involving higher-lying locally excited triplet excited states has to be invoked to witness the magnitude of the rate of reverse inter-system crossing (RISC) rates. The increased complexity has challenged the reliability of computational methods to accurately predict the relative energy between excited states as well as their nature. Here, we compare the results of widely used density functional theory (DFT) functionals, CAM-B3LYP, LC-ωPBE, LC-ω*PBE, LC-ω*HPBE, B3LYP, PBE0, and M06-2X, against a wavefunction-based reference method, Spin-Component Scaling second-order approximate Coupled Cluster (SCS-CC2), in 14 known TADF emitters possessing a diversity of chemical structures. Overall, the use of the Tamm–Dancoff Approximation (TDA) together with CAM-B3LYP, M06-2X, and the two ω-tuned range-separated functionals LC-ω*PBE and LC-ω*HPBE demonstrated the best agreement with SCS-CC2 calculations in predicting the absolute energy of the singlet S1, and triplet T1 and T2 excited states and their energy differences. However, consistently across the series and irrespective of the functional or the use of TDA, the nature of T1 and T2 is not as accurately captured as compared to S1. We also investigated the impact of the optimization of S1 and T1 excited states on ΔEST and the nature of these states for three different functionals (PBE0, CAM-B3LYP, and M06-2X). We observed large changes in ΔEST using CAM-B3LYP and PBE0 functionals associated with a large stabilization of T1 with CAM-B3LYP and a large stabilization of S1 with PBE0, while ΔEST is much less affected considering the M06-2X functional. The nature of the S1 state barely evolves after geometry optimization essentially because this state is CT by nature for the three functionals tested. However, the prediction of the T1 nature is more problematic since these functionals for some compounds interpret the nature of T1 very differently. SCS-CC2 calculations on top of the TDA-DFT optimized geometries lead to a large variation in terms of ΔEST and the excited-state nature depending on the chosen functionals, further stressing the large dependence of the excited-state features on the excited-state geometries. The presented work highlights that despite good agreement of energies, the description of the exact nature of the triplet states should be undertaken with caution.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe St Andrews team would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2016-047) for financial support. Computational resources have been provided by the Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif (CÉCI), funded by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifiques de Belgique (F.R.S.-FNRS) under Grant No. 2.5020.11, as well as the Tier-1 supercomputer of the Fédération Wallonie–Bruxelles, infrastructure funded by the Walloon Region under the Grant Agreement n1117545. Y.O. acknowledges funding by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS under Grant no. F.4534.21 (MIS-IMAGINE). D.B. is a FNRS Research Director. J.C.S.-G. acknowledges funding from the “Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación” through the PID2019-106114GB-I00 project.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societyes_ES
dc.rights© 2023 American Chemical Societyes_ES
dc.subjectThermally Activated Delayed Fluorescencees_ES
dc.subjectTime-Dependent Density Functional Theoryes_ES
dc.subjectExcited State Analysises_ES
dc.subjectCoupled Clusteres_ES
dc.titleBenchmarking DFT Functionals for Excited-State Calculations of Donor–Acceptor TADF Emitters: Insights on the Key Parameters Determining Reverse Inter-System Crossinges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.peerreviewedsies_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.jpca.2c08201-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c08201es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2019-106114GB-I00es_ES
Appears in Collections:INV - QC - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailHall_etal_2023_JPhysChemA_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)7,44 MBAdobe PDFOpen    Request a copy
ThumbnailHall_etal_2023_JPhysChemA_preprint.pdfPreprint (acceso abierto)1,67 MBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.