Analysis of the characteristics of electronic equipment usage distance for common users

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/117302
Registro completo de metadatos
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributorGrupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSoler, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-García, Alicia-
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Martín, Ainhoa-
dc.contributor.authorFez Saiz, Dolores de-
dc.contributor.authorDíaz, Valentín-
dc.contributor.authorPiñero, David P.-
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-29T14:26:41Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-29T14:26:41Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-
dc.identifier.citationGuoji Yanke Zazhi (Int Eye Sci). 2021, 21(9): 1508-1514. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.9.03es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1672-5123-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/117302-
dc.description.abstractAIM: To analyse and characterize the pattern of working and mobile phone usage distances (MPUD) for common users of electronic devices and computers. METHODS: Transversal descriptive study consisting of a screening campaign evaluating the visual status of different professionals working with computers or electronic devices more than 2h per day. A total of 100 healthy patients with a mean age of 41.2 (range: 20-62) years were revised and subdivided according to job subgroups. A battery of screening tests was performed to all participants in a single session at the working environment of each of them, including measurement of the working distance (WD), arm length, and MPUD. RESULTS: The WD was significantly longer than MPUD (61.22±12.35 vs 32.22±6.35 cm; P<0.001). Likewise, MPUD was significantly shorter than the arm length (74.44±4.65 cm; P<0.001). A total of 4% (4/100) and 91% (91/100) of patients had a WD and MPUD of 40 cm or below, respectively. A weak although statistically significant correlation was found between WD and MPUD (r=0.387, P<0.001) as well as between WD and arm length (r=0.260, P=0.009). Statistically significant differences were detected among job subgroups in WD(P=0.021), being longer for militaries compared to university researchers and lecturers (P=0.025). CONCLUSION: Working and mobile phone usage distances vary significantly among common users of computers and digital devices, although the use of mobile phones tends to be performed at significantly closer distances. This parameter should be considered when planning any type of optical correction, especially for presbyopia.es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherGuoji Yanke Zazhishees_ES
dc.rights© Guoji Yanke Zazhies_ES
dc.subjectPresbyopiaes_ES
dc.subjectWorking distancees_ES
dc.subjectMobile phone usage distancees_ES
dc.subjectElectronic devicees_ES
dc.subject.otherÓpticaes_ES
dc.titleAnalysis of the characteristics of electronic equipment usage distance for common userses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.peerreviewedsies_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.9.03-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.9.03es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
ThumbnailSoler_etal_2021_IntEyeSci.pdf2,01 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.