Combined passive and active treatment in strabismic amblyopia with accommodative component

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/109956
Full metadata record
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorGrupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Martín, Ainhoa-
dc.contributor.authorMartín‐González, Santiago-
dc.contributor.authorIllarramendi‐Mendicute, Igor-
dc.contributor.authorPortela‐Camino, Juan A.-
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomíaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-28T15:51:07Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-28T15:51:07Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.citationClinical and Experimental Optometry. 2020, 103(6): 885-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.13140es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0816-4622 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn1444-0938 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10045/109956-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Treatment of amblyopia in esotropic subjects with accommodative component currently consists of optical correction and subsequent occlusion, or penalisation, of the dominant eye. This treatment obtains a good outcome in visual acuity but poor outcomes in binocular vision. An intervention protocol that could improve the outcome of conventional treatment is presented. Methods: A retrospective study in subjects with amblyopia associated with both fully accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia is presented. Subjects were refracted under cycloplegia and treated with occlusion (passive therapy). Subjects who did not achieve orthotropia through optical correction (partially accommodative esotropia) performed an active therapy (full‐time prismatic correction and subsequent fusional vergence therapy or surgery in larger angles > 12 prism dioptres). After treatment, the subjects were examined by a masked optometrist in an external ophthalmology clinic. Results: Twenty‐six subjects (12 males and 14 females) aged from six to 13 years (median 8.50; interquartile range [IQR] 3) were included. Median age of detection was three years (IQR 1). All the subjects were hyperopic. In the baseline, median best‐corrected visual acuity of the amblyopic eye was 0.40 logMAR (IQR 0.30) and 0.00 logMAR (IQR 0.01) in the dominant eye. After the treatment, the median best‐corrected visual acuity in the amblyopic eye was 0.06 logMAR (IQR 0.08). These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). All subjects acquired stereoacuity equal or better than 800′′ with the Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test. Conclusions: The proposed treatment highlights the management of amblyopia in esotropic subjects with accommodative component. This intervention protocol could help to determine if the treatment has to be passive (in fully accommodative esotropia) or a combination of passive and active therapies (in partially accommodative esotropia).es_ES
dc.languageenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rights© 2020 Optometry Australiaes_ES
dc.subjectActive therapyes_ES
dc.subjectAmblyopiaes_ES
dc.subjectEsotropiaes_ES
dc.subjectOcclusiones_ES
dc.subjectPrismationes_ES
dc.subjectStrabismic amblyopiaes_ES
dc.subjectStrabismuses_ES
dc.subjectVergence therapyes_ES
dc.subject.otherÓpticaes_ES
dc.titleCombined passive and active treatment in strabismic amblyopia with accommodative componentes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.peerreviewedsies_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cxo.13140-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.13140es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
Appears in Collections:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailMolina-Martin_etal_2020_ClinExpOptom_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)728,62 kBAdobe PDFOpen    Request a copy


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.