Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/103292
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses
Authors: Palomino-Bautista, Carlos | Sánchez-Jean, Rubén | Carmona-González, David | Piñero, David P. | Molina-Martín, Ainhoa
Research Group/s: Grupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía
Keywords: Depth of field | Depth of focus | Defocus curves | Aberrometry | Cataract surgery | Extended depth of focus IOL | Pseudophakic
Knowledge Area: Óptica
Issue Date: 3-Oct-2019
Publisher: Springer Nature
Citation: International Ophthalmology. 2020, 40: 351-359. doi:10.1007/s10792-019-01186-6
Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate different intraocular lens (IOL) designs and to determine whether extended depth of focus (EDOF) lenses provide a higher depth of field (DOF) than the rest considering both subjective and objective measurements. Methods: A total of 100 eyes undergoing cataract surgery were divided into six groups depending on the IOL implanted: bifocal designs were Tecnis ZMB and ZLB (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois, USA), trifocal designs were Finevision (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) and AT LISA Tri (Carl Zeiss Meditec., Jena, Germany) and EDOF designs were Symfony (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois, USA) and MiniWell (SIFI MedTech, Catania, Italy). Subjective DOF was obtained from defocus curves for the range of vergences which provide a VA over 0.1 LogMAR and 0.2 LogMAR. Aberrometry was measured and Visual Strehl Optical Transference Function (90%) was used to quantify objectively the DOF. Results: Symfony IOL group showed better subjective and objective DOF compared to the rest of IOL groups, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). Comparison between subjective and objective DOF showed that subjective measures were higher for all IOLs, being these differences statistically significant for all groups when compared with objective measures (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Objective and subjective measures of DOF are not comparable due to differences in methodologies and criterions to define the level of degradation acceptance. Nevertheless, both objective and subjective measures demonstrate a greater DOF for EDOF designs compared to bifocal and trifocal IOLs, being the Symfony IOL the one providing higher levels of subjective and objective DOF.
Sponsor: The author David P Piñero has been supported by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness of Spain within the program Ramón y Cajal, RYC-2016-20471.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/103292
ISSN: 0165-5701 (Print) | 1573-2630 (Online)
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01186-6
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © Springer Nature B.V. 2019
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01186-6
Appears in Collections:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thumbnail2020_Palomino-Bautista_etal_IntOphthalmol_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)253,28 kBAdobe PDFOpen    Request a copy


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.