Altavilla, Cesare, Cejuela, Roberto, Caballero, Pablo
Effect of Different Feedback Modalities on Swimming Pace: Which Feedback Modality is Most Effective?
Journal of Human Kinetics. 2018, 65: 187-195. doi:10.2478/hukin-2018-0026
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/87248
DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2018-0026
ISSN: 1640-5544 (Print)
Abstract: 
To compare the effect of three different feedback modalities on swimming pace, sixteen male swimmers and triathletes participated in this study. Each participant swam 3 x 400 m, one for each feedback modality, swimming front crawl at 80% of their individual swimming critical speed. Three feedback modalities were examined: self-pacing, real time visual feedback and real time voice feedback. The swimmers adopted a fast start in all feedback modalities. In the real time voice feedback modality, the data recorded during the second lap (200 m) showed a significant improvement of their swimming pace approaching the swimming pace intended (-1.47 s, p < .01, medium effect size 0.79). A significant improvement toward the swimming pace intended was also noticed at the third split time (300 m) (0.05 s, p < .01, large effect size 0.81) and at the fourth split time (400 m) (0.46 s, p < .01, medium effect size 0.76). In self-pacing, the swimmers were not able to swim in line with the swimming pace intended. In real time visual feedback modality, the swimmers did not show a significant improvement approaching the swimming pace intended. The results revealed that communication with the swimmers using the real time voice feedback induced a significant improvement in their swimming pace and could help the athletes to swim with accurate and consistent pace.
Keywords:Training, Performance, Auditory pathways, Sensory, Split time
De Gruyter
info:eu-repo/semantics/article