Evaluation of algorithms to predict graduation rate in higher education institutions by applying educational data mining

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/93995
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Evaluation of algorithms to predict graduation rate in higher education institutions by applying educational data mining
Autor/es: Moscoso-Zea, Oswaldo | Saa, Pablo | Luján-Mora, Sergio
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Advanced deveLopment and empIrical research on Software (ALISoft)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos
Palabras clave: Data mining | Data warehouse | Educational data mining | Academic development
Área/s de conocimiento: Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos
Fecha de publicación: 11-abr-2019
Editor: Taylor & Francis
Cita bibliográfica: Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. 2019, 24(1): 4-13. doi:10.1080/22054952.2019.1601063
Resumen: Nowadays, researchers analyse student data to predict the graduation rate by looking at the characteristics of students enrolled and to take corrective actions at an early stage or improve the admission process. Educational data mining (EDM) is an emerging field that can support the implementation of changes in the management of higher education institutions. EDM analyses educational data using the development and the application of data mining (DM) methods and algorithms to information stored in academic data repositories. The purpose of this paper is to review which methods and algorithms of DM can be used in the analysis of educational data to improve decision-making. Furthermore, it evaluates these algorithms using a dataset composed of student data in the computer science school of a private university. The core of the analysis is to discover trends and patterns of study in the graduation rate indicator. Finally, it compares these methods and algorithms and suggests which has the best precision in certain scenarios. Our analyses suggest that random trees had better precision but had limitations due to the difficulty of interpretation while the J48 algorithm had better possibilities of interpretation of results in the visualisation of the classification of data and only had slightly inferior performance.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/93995
ISSN: 1325-4340 (Print) | 1324-5821 (Online)
DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2019.1601063
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2019 Engineers Australia
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2019.1601063
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - ALISoft - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2019_Moscoso-Zea_etal_AustralasianJEngEdu_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)1,42 MBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia
Thumbnail2019_Moscoso-Zea_etal_AustralasianJEngEdu_preprint.pdfPreprint (acceso abierto)438,09 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.