Coastal scenery and litter impacts at Alicante (SE Spain): management issues
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/88589
Título: | Coastal scenery and litter impacts at Alicante (SE Spain): management issues |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Asensio-Montesinos, Francisco | Anfuso, Giorgio | Corbí, Hugo |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Cambios Paleoambientales |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra y del Medio Ambiente |
Palabras clave: | Litter | Beach management | Coastal landscape | Mediterranean | Costa Blanca |
Área/s de conocimiento: | Estratigrafía |
Fecha de publicación: | feb-2019 |
Editor: | Springer Netherlands |
Cita bibliográfica: | Journal of Coastal Conservation. 2019, 23(1): 185-201. doi:10.1007/s11852-018-0651-8 |
Resumen: | Coastal scenery value was evaluated at 56 locations along the 244 km long coast of Alicante (western Mediterranean) according to the methodology of Ergin et al. Area 36(4):367–386, (2004) based on the evaluation of 26 physical and anthropogenic parameters. Selected areas covered remote (10), rural (9), village (15) and urban (22) bathing areas. The scenery Decision Value parameter (D), allowed to classify the investigated sites into 5 classes, from Class I (extremely attractive/natural sites) to Class V (very unattractive/urbanized sites): 2 sites belonged to Class I, 6 to Class II, 14 to Class III, 20 to Class IV and 14 to Class V. Litter presence was assessed at the same sites using the EA/NALG (2000) methodology, which allowed to classify each site in four grades: A: very good (40 sites); B: good (14); C: fair (1) and D: poor (1). In urban sites litter was composed by small items related to land-based sources and beach use while litter in natural sites was related to marine-based sources, essentially fishing. The sector analysis methodology highlighted as most sites (33 out of 56) showed contradictory characteristics for litter/scenic grades/beach awards presence. To improve scenic value, different actions have to be carried out according to the site typology. At many urban sites, actuations should be focused to the removing or reducing of beach utilities and unnecessary infrastructures. At rural and remote areas, is mandatory to carry out specific litter management plans to reduce litter presence. |
Patrocinador/es: | This research was partially supported by the project GRE14-05 (University of Alicante). This work is a contribution to the Andalusia PAI Research Group RNM-328 and to the RED PROPLAYAS network. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/88589 |
ISSN: | 1400-0350 (Print) | 1874-7841 (Online) |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11852-018-0651-8 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos: | © Springer Nature B.V. 2018 |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-018-0651-8 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - CP - Artículos de Revistas |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019_Asensio-Montesinos_etal_JCoastConserv_final.pdf | Versión final (acceso restringido) | 7,24 MB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Solicitar una copia |
Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.