Effect of Different Feedback Modalities on Swimming Pace: Which Feedback Modality is Most Effective?

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/87248
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Effect of Different Feedback Modalities on Swimming Pace: Which Feedback Modality is Most Effective?
Autor/es: Altavilla, Cesare | Cejuela Anta, Roberto | Caballero, Pablo
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Research in Physical Education, Fitness and Performance (RIPEFAP) | Análisis de Alimentos y Nutrición | Grupo Balmis de Investigación en Salud Comunitaria e Historia de la Ciencia
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia
Palabras clave: Training | Performance | Auditory pathways | Sensory | Split time
Área/s de conocimiento: Educación Física y Deportiva | Enfermería
Fecha de publicación: 31-dic-2018
Editor: De Gruyter
Cita bibliográfica: Journal of Human Kinetics. 2018, 65: 187-195. doi:10.2478/hukin-2018-0026
Resumen: To compare the effect of three different feedback modalities on swimming pace, sixteen male swimmers and triathletes participated in this study. Each participant swam 3 x 400 m, one for each feedback modality, swimming front crawl at 80% of their individual swimming critical speed. Three feedback modalities were examined: self-pacing, real time visual feedback and real time voice feedback. The swimmers adopted a fast start in all feedback modalities. In the real time voice feedback modality, the data recorded during the second lap (200 m) showed a significant improvement of their swimming pace approaching the swimming pace intended (-1.47 s, p < .01, medium effect size 0.79). A significant improvement toward the swimming pace intended was also noticed at the third split time (300 m) (0.05 s, p < .01, large effect size 0.81) and at the fourth split time (400 m) (0.46 s, p < .01, medium effect size 0.76). In self-pacing, the swimmers were not able to swim in line with the swimming pace intended. In real time visual feedback modality, the swimmers did not show a significant improvement approaching the swimming pace intended. The results revealed that communication with the swimmers using the real time voice feedback induced a significant improvement in their swimming pace and could help the athletes to swim with accurate and consistent pace.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/87248
ISSN: 1640-5544 (Print) | 1899-7562 (Online)
DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2018-0026
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2018-0026
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - RIPEFAP - Artículos de Revistas
INV - AAQCN - Artículos de Revistas
INV - BISCHA - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2018_Altavilla_etal_JHumanKinetics.pdf308,13 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons