Risk of progression to Alzheimer’s disease for different neuropsychological Mild Cognitive Impairment subtypes: A hierarchical meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/83849
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Risk of progression to Alzheimer’s disease for different neuropsychological Mild Cognitive Impairment subtypes: A hierarchical meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
Autor/es: Oltra-Cucarella, Javier | Ferrer-Cascales, Rosario | Alegret, Montserrat | Gasparini, Ruth | Díaz-Ortiz, Leslie Michelle | Ríos, Rocío | Martínez-Nogueras, Ángel Luis | Onandia, Iban | Pérez-Vicente, José A. | Cabello-Rodríguez, Luis | Sanchez-SanSegundo, Miriam
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Psicología Aplicada a la Salud y Comportamiento Humano (PSYBHE)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Psicología de la Salud
Palabras clave: Alzheimer’s disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Dementia | Meta-analysis | Robust variance estimator
Área/s de conocimiento: Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico
Fecha de publicación: nov-2018
Editor: American Psychological Association
Cita bibliográfica: Psychology and Aging. 2018, 33(7): 1007-1021. doi:10.1037/pag0000294
Resumen: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a heterogeneous condition between normal aging and dementia. Upon neuropsychological testing, MCI can be divided into 4 groups: single-domain amnestic MCI (sd-aMCI), multiple-domain amnestic MCI (md-aMCI), single- and multiple-domain nonamnestic MCI (sd-naMCI, md-naMCI). Some controversy exists about whether the risk of progression to Alzheimer’s disease (risk-AD) is increased in all MCI subtypes. We meta-analyzed the risk-AD for 4 MCI groups using random-effects metaregression with the Hierarchical Robust Variance Estimator and sample size, criterion for objective cognitive impairment, length of follow-up and source of recruitment as covariates. From a pool of 134 available studies, 81 groups from 33 studies (N = 4,907) were meta-analyzed. All the studies were rated as having a high risk of bias. aMCI is overrepresented in studies from memory clinics. Multivariate analyses showed that md-aMCI had a similar risk-AD relative to sd-aMCI, whereas both sd-naMCI and md-naMCI showed a lower risk-AD compared with sd-aMCI. The risk-AD was significantly associated with differences in sample sizes across studies and between groups within studies. md-aMCI had a similar risk-AD relative to sd-aMCI in studies from memory clinics and in studies in the community. Several potential sources of bias such as blindness of AD diagnosis, the MCI diagnosis approach and the reporting of demographics were associated with the risk-AD. This work provides important data for use in both clinical and research scenarios.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/83849
ISSN: 0882-7974 (Print) | 1939-1498 (Online)
DOI: 10.1037/pag0000294
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2018 American Psychological Association
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000294
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - PSYBHE - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2018_Oltra-Cucarella_etal_PsycholAging_accepted.pdfAccepted Manuscript (acceso abierto)1,44 MBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.