Differential Effects of Cognition-Focused Interventions for People With Alzheimer’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/83779
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Differential Effects of Cognition-Focused Interventions for People With Alzheimer’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis
Authors: Oltra-Cucarella, Javier | Ferrer-Cascales, Rosario | Clare, Linda | Morris, Scott B. | Espert, Raúl | Tirapu, Javier | Sánchez San Segundo, Miriam
Research Group/s: Psicología Aplicada a la Salud y Comportamiento Humano (PSYBHE)
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Psicología de la Salud
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease | Cognitive rehabilitation | Cognitive training | Cognitive stimulation | Meta-analysis
Knowledge Area: Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico
Issue Date: Sep-2018
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Citation: Neuropsychology. 2018, 32(6): 664-679. doi:10.1037/neu0000449
Abstract: Objective: The efficacy of cognition-focused interventions (CFIs) for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been questioned recently. To date, the specific effects of cognitive rehabilitation (CR), cognitive training (CT), and cognitive stimulation [CS] have not been analyzed due to inconsistencies in the use of the comparison groups. This work aims to analyze the differential effects of CFIs by removing the influence of the comparison group from the estimates of the effects. Method: a literature search performed in Pubmed, Proquest, and Embase databases yielded 65 potential studies, of which 33 studies with a sample size of 1,225 individuals were meta-analyzed. Each intervention group was treated as the unit of analysis to remove the confounding effects of the comparison condition. Measures of general cognitive functioning, memory and functional outcomes were compared using the hierarchical robust variance estimator metaregression. Age, education, sex, risk of bias, sample size, duration of intervention, the proportion of drop-outs, pharmacological treatment, and severity of disease were included as covariates. Results: Only CT differed from no cognition-focused interventions (NCFI) for memory outcomes in univariate analyses, but differences became nonsignificant when covariates were included in the model. CR showed a significantly higher effect in outcomes measuring functioning in targeted domains with no differences in standard cognitive tests relative to NCFI. Conclusions: This work supports previous findings questioning the efficacy of CT or CS for AD. Moving toward CFIs focused on relevant goals and including measures related to the skills, abilities or activities that are the focus of the intervention is encouraged.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/83779
ISSN: 0894-4105 (Print) | 1931-1559 (Online)
DOI: 10.1037/neu0000449
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2018 American Psychological Association
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000449
Appears in Collections:INV - PSYBHE - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thumbnail2018_Oltra-Cucarella_etal_Neuropsychology_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)1,9 MBAdobe PDFOpen    Request a copy


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.