Comparison Between Q-Adjusted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/83390
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Comparison Between Q-Adjusted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
Autor/es: El-Mayah, Esraa | Anis, Mohamed | Salem, Mohsen | Piñero, David P. | Hosny, Mohamed
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Grupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual (GOPV)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía
Palabras clave: SMILE | LASIK | Custom Q | HOA
Área/s de conocimiento: Óptica
Fecha de publicación: nov-2018
Editor: Wolters Kluwer Health
Cita bibliográfica: Eye & Contact Lens. 2018, 44: S426–S432. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000532
Resumen: Purpose: To compare Q-adjusted femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in terms of safety, efficacy, and predictability, as well as in terms of changes in dry eye parameters, corneal biomechanics, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and corneal asphericity. Methods: A total of 60 eyes were enrolled in this prospective comparative study: 30 underwent SMILE and 30 underwent FS-LASIK. Changes in manifest refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity, corneal topography, corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) (Ocular Response Analyzer, ORA), and dry eye parameters were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. Results: Mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was −4.17 (±1.86) preoperatively in FS-SMILE group and −3.97 (±2.02) in FS-LASIK group (P=0.69). Mean postoperative MRSE in FS-SMILE group was −0.25±0.38 diopter (D) and −0.183±0.33 D in FS-SMILE group (P=0.50). A total of 93% of treated eyes in both groups had a MRSE within ±0.5 D. The mean percentage change of CH was 14.23±17.59 and 18.89±7.2 mm Hg (P=0.1871) in FS-SMILE and FS-LASIK groups, respectively. The mean percentage change of CRF was 27.43±16.8 and 21.32±17.1 mm Hg (P=0.1682) in FS-SMILE and FS-LASIK groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference between techniques were found in the values of Schirmer test (P=0.0002) and tear breakup time (P=0.0035). Regarding corneal HOAs, no statistically significant differences between groups were found in the change in the root mean square of HOAs (P=0.2), coma aberration (P=0.0589), and spherical aberration (P=0.0543). Conclusion: SMILE is as safe and predictable as FS-LASIK. According to the ORA system, SMILE is not better than FS-LASIK in terms of biomechanical changes. However, SMILE causes less effect on dry eye parameters during the first 3 postoperative months.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/83390
ISSN: 1542-2321 (Print) | 1542-233X (Online)
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000532
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2018 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000532
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GOPV - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2018_El-Mayah_etal_Eye&ContactLens_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)435,21 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.