Effects of Two Different Training Periodization Models on Physical and Physiological Aspects of Elite Female Team Handball Players
Empreu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest ítem
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/76587
Títol: | Effects of Two Different Training Periodization Models on Physical and Physiological Aspects of Elite Female Team Handball Players |
---|---|
Autors: | Manchado, Carmen | Cortell-Tormo, Juan M. | Tortosa-Martínez, Juan |
Grups d'investigació o GITE: | Research in Physical Education, Fitness and Performance (RIPEFAP) | Grupo de Investigación en Alimentación y Nutrición (ALINUT) |
Centre, Departament o Servei: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas |
Paraules clau: | Traditional periodization | Block periodization | Strength | Throwing velocity | Team sports |
Àrees de coneixement: | Educación Física y Deportiva |
Data de publicació: | de gener-2018 |
Editor: | Wolters Kluwer Health |
Citació bibliogràfica: | The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2018, 32(1): 280-287. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002259 |
Resum: | The aim of this study was to compare training-induced changes in selected physiological and physical team handball performance factors after 2 training periodization models: traditional periodization (TP) vs. block periodization (BP). Eleven female team handball players who played over 2 consecutive seasons for a Spanish first league team were assessed twice per season during a training cycle. On each occasion, participants completed anthropometric, maximal strength, and lower-body power assessments. In addition, incremental tests to determine maximum oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), sprint- and sport-specific throwing velocity tests were performed. Block periodization group experienced significantly greater improvements than TP on squat jump (5.97%; p < 0.001), countermovement jump (8.76%; p = 0.011), hand-grip strength (8.22%; p = 0.029), bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) (5.14%; p = 0.049), 10-m sprint (−6.19%; p < 0.001), and 20-m sprint (2.95%; p = 0.008). Greater changes in BP group (p ≤ 0.05) were also found for the throwing velocities in sport-specific tests compared with the TP group. No significant difference between the groups were detected for the half-squat 1RM (p = 0.15) and the V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (p = 0.44). These findings suggest that BP may be more effective than TP for improving important physiological and physical team handball performance factors in high level female handball players. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/76587 |
ISSN: | 1064-8011 (Print) | 1533-4287 (Online) |
DOI: | 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002259 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipus: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Drets: | © 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association |
Revisió científica: | si |
Versió de l'editor: | https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002259 |
Apareix a la col·lecció: | INV - ALINUT - Artículos de Revistas INV - SCAPE - Artículos de Revistas INV - HEALTH-TECH - Artículos de Revistas |
Arxius per aquest ítem:
Arxiu | Descripció | Tamany | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018_Manchado_etal_JStrengthCondRes_final.pdf | Versión final (acceso restringido) | 110,29 kB | Adobe PDF | Obrir Sol·licitar una còpia |
Tots els documents dipositats a RUA estan protegits per drets d'autors. Alguns drets reservats.