Effects of Two Different Training Periodization Models on Physical and Physiological Aspects of Elite Female Team Handball Players

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/76587
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Effects of Two Different Training Periodization Models on Physical and Physiological Aspects of Elite Female Team Handball Players
Autor/es: Manchado, Carmen | Cortell-Tormo, Juan M. | Tortosa Martínez, Juan
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Research in Physical Education, Fitness and Performance (RIPEFAP) | Grupo de Investigación en Alimentación y Nutrición (ALINUT)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas
Palabras clave: Traditional periodization | Block periodization | Strength | Throwing velocity | Team sports
Área/s de conocimiento: Educación Física y Deportiva
Fecha de publicación: ene-2018
Editor: Wolters Kluwer Health
Cita bibliográfica: The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2018, 32(1): 280-287. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002259
Resumen: The aim of this study was to compare training-induced changes in selected physiological and physical team handball performance factors after 2 training periodization models: traditional periodization (TP) vs. block periodization (BP). Eleven female team handball players who played over 2 consecutive seasons for a Spanish first league team were assessed twice per season during a training cycle. On each occasion, participants completed anthropometric, maximal strength, and lower-body power assessments. In addition, incremental tests to determine maximum oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max), sprint- and sport-specific throwing velocity tests were performed. Block periodization group experienced significantly greater improvements than TP on squat jump (5.97%; p < 0.001), countermovement jump (8.76%; p = 0.011), hand-grip strength (8.22%; p = 0.029), bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) (5.14%; p = 0.049), 10-m sprint (−6.19%; p < 0.001), and 20-m sprint (2.95%; p = 0.008). Greater changes in BP group (p ≤ 0.05) were also found for the throwing velocities in sport-specific tests compared with the TP group. No significant difference between the groups were detected for the half-squat 1RM (p = 0.15) and the V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (p = 0.44). These findings suggest that BP may be more effective than TP for improving important physiological and physical team handball performance factors in high level female handball players.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/76587
ISSN: 1064-8011 (Print) | 1533-4287 (Online)
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002259
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2017 National Strength and Conditioning Association
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002259
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - ALINUT - Artículos de Revistas
INV - RIPEFAP - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2018_Manchado_etal_JStrengthCondRes_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)110,29 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.