Comparative Assessment of Goods and Services Provided by Grazing Regulation and Reforestation in Degraded Mediterranean Rangelands

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/66109
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: Comparative Assessment of Goods and Services Provided by Grazing Regulation and Reforestation in Degraded Mediterranean Rangelands
Autor/es: Papanastasis, Vasilios P. | Bautista, Susana | Chouvardas, Dimitrios | Mantzanas, Konstantinos | Papadimitriou, Maria | Mayor, Angeles G. | Koukioumi, Polina | Papaioannou, Athanasios | Vallejo Calzada, Ramón
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Gestión de Ecosistemas y de la Biodiversidad (GEB)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología | Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio "Ramón Margalef"
Palabras clave: Carbon sequestration | Ecosystem services | Forage | Grazing management | Landscape functional analysis | Plant diversity | Restoration actions | Soil functions
Área/s de conocimiento: Ecología
Fecha de publicación: may-2017
Editor: John Wiley & Sons
Cita bibliográfica: Land Degradation & Development. 2017, 28(4): 1178-1187. doi:10.1002/ldr.2368
Resumen: Several management actions are applied to restore ecosystem services in degraded Mediterranean rangelands, which range from adjusting the grazing pressure to the removal of grazers and pine plantations. Four such actions were assessed in Quercus coccifera L. shrublands in northern Greece: (i) moderate grazing by goats and sheep; (ii) no grazing; (iii) no grazing plus pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) plantation in forest gaps (gap reforestation); and (iv) no grazing plus full reforestation of shrubland areas, also with P. pinaster. In addition, heavy grazing was also assessed to serve as a control action. We comparatively assessed the impact of these actions on key provisioning, regulating and supporting ecosystem services by using ground-based indicators. Depending on the ecosystem service considered, the management actions were ranked differently. However, the overall provision of services was particularly favoured under moderate and no grazing management options, with moderate grazing outranking any other action in provisioning services and the no grazing action presenting the most balanced provision of services. Pine reforestations largely contributed to water and soil conservation and C sequestration but had a negative impact on plant diversity when implemented at the expense of removing natural vegetation in the area. Heavy grazing had the lowest provision of ecosystem services. It is concluded that degraded rangelands can be restored by moderating the grazing pressure rather than completely banning livestock grazing or converting them into pine plantations.
Patrocinador/es: This research is part of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and Support Action PRACTICE (Prevention and Restoration Actions to Combat Desertification: An Integrative assessment—grant agreement no. 226828). The research of S. B., A. G. M. and V. R. V. has received funding from the projects CASCADE (funded by EU-FP7; grant agreement no. 283068), GRACCIE (CSD2007-00067, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Innovation and Science, Consolider-Ingenio 2010 Program) and SFUN (CGL2011-30515-C02-00, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/66109
ISSN: 1085-3278 (Print) | 1099-145X (Online)
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2368
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Derechos: © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2368
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - GEB - Artículos de Revistas
Investigaciones financiadas por la UE

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2017_Papanastasis_etal_LandDegradDevelop_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)377,65 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia
Thumbnail2017_Papanastasis_etal_LandDegradDevelop_accepted.pdfAccepted Manuscript (acceso abierto)758,66 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa


Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.