Assessment of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Reproducibility of Micro-Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones in Women: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/66094
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Assessment of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Reproducibility of Micro-Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones in Women: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Authors: Caballero-Romeu, Juan-Pablo | Galán-Llopis, Juan-Antonio | Pérez-Fentes, Daniel | Budia-Alba, Alberto | Cepeda-Delgado, Marcos | Palmero-Marti, Jose-Luis | Cansino-Alcaide, Jose-Ramón | Caballero, Pablo | Ibarluzea-Gonzalez, Gaspar
Research Group/s: Grupo Balmis de Investigación en Salud Comunitaria e Historia de la Ciencia
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia
Keywords: Miniaturization | Minimally invasive surgical procedures | Reproducibility of results | Ureteroscopy | Urinary calculi
Knowledge Area: Enfermería
Issue Date: 1-Nov-2016
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert
Citation: Journal of Endourology. 2016, 30(11): 1185-1193. doi:10.1089/end.2016.0503
Abstract: Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness, safety, and reproducibility of the micro-ureteroscopy (m-URS) in the treatment of distal ureteral stones in women. Materials and Methods: A multicenter, prospective observational study was designed and conducted between March and December 2015. We included women having at least one stone in the distal ureter and being a candidate for surgical treatment using the 4.85F sheath of MicroPerc®. Patients with clinical criteria and/or laboratory analysis indicating sepsis or coagulation alteration were excluded. Results: Thirty-nine women were operated in eight hospitals. The profile of the patients was fairly homogeneous among hospitals. Only differences were found in age, preoperative stent, and the result of the previous urine culture. Immediate stone-free status was achieved in 88.2% and 100% 7 days after the procedure. 97.4% of patients did not present any complication in the postoperative period, with only one case with complication Clavien II. Postureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) in 76.9% of patients did not show any injury, 20.5% had lesions grade 1, and grade 2 lesions 2.6%. As for the reproducibility of m-URS between hospitals, statistical analysis of the results showed differences between all the centers participating in the study. Conclusions: m-URS is an effective, safe, and reproducible technique that minimizes surgical aggression to the ureteral anatomy. Satisfactory and comparable results to “conventional” ureteroscopy were obtained in the treatment of distal ureteral stones in women, although clinical trials are needed. The reduction of the ureteral damage may reduce secondary procedures and increase the cost-effectiveness of the procedure.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/66094
ISSN: 2152-4920 (Print) | 2152-4939 (Online)
DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0503
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0503
Appears in Collections:INV - BISCHA - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thumbnail2016_Caballero-Romeu_etal_JEndourology.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)3,14 MBAdobe PDFOpen    Request a copy
Thumbnail2016_Caballero-Romeu_etal_JEndourology_accepted.pdfAccepted Manuscript (acceso abierto)1,19 MBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.