Archaeological Quantification of Pottery: The Rims Count Adjusted using the Modulus of Rupture (MR)

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/62269
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Archaeological Quantification of Pottery: The Rims Count Adjusted using the Modulus of Rupture (MR)
Authors: Mateo Corredor, Daniel | Molina Vidal, Jaime
Research Group/s: Culturas Antiguas y Cultura Material
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Prehistoria, Arqueología, Historia Antigua, Filología Griega y Filología Latina
Keywords: Archaeological quantification | Rims count | Modulus of rupture (Mr) | Minimum number of individuals (Mni) | Sherd weight | Sherd count | Average capacity
Knowledge Area: Historia Antigua
Issue Date: Apr-2016
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Archaeometry. 2016, 58(2): 333-346. doi:10.1111/arcm.12171
Abstract: Archaeological quantification is a recurrent issue in research about pottery, its typologies and its distribution. We accept the validity of other methods of quantification—sherd count, minimum number of individuals (MNI) or sherd weight—but the methodology that we have proposed for quantification of assemblages of archaeological contexts is the rims count, which has to be transformed into coefficients of reference through a correction using the modulus of rupture (MR). Such correctors are obtained through measuring the percentage of preserved rim of a significant number of sherds of each type and establishing the average of that percentage. This quantification method is easily applicable to all pottery types and it is also statistically reliable. Besides, it can be used in any study in which the gross number of rims is published. Finally, in the case of ceramic transport containers, a second correction can be applied by multiplying the corrected coefficient (number of rims × MR) by its average capacity (AC), another corrector that will allow us to gather statistics according to the litres of transported product. We believe that the rims count (the easiest part to classify) is a fast, relatively easy and very reliable method that needs to be corrected using the MR.
Sponsor: This research has been developed in the context of the projects HAR2012-37003-C03-02, HAR2012-32881, HAR2011-28244, ARCHÉOSTRAITS and SIDPH/DI.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/62269
ISSN: 0003-813X (Print) | 1475-4754 (Online)
DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12171
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: © 2015 University of Oxford
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12171
Appears in Collections:INV - CACM - Artículos de Revistas

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thumbnail2016_Mateo_Molina_Archaeometry_final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)189,15 kBAdobe PDFOpen    Request a copy
Thumbnail2016_Mateo_Molina_Archaeometry_rev.pdfVersión revisada (acceso abierto)249,69 kBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


Items in RUA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.