MDD vs. traditional software development: a practitioner’s subjective perspective

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Título: MDD vs. traditional software development: a practitioner’s subjective perspective
Autor/es: Martínez Espinosa, Yulkeidi | Cachero, Cristina | Meliá, Santiago
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: Ingeniería Web, Aplicaciones y Desarrollos (IWAD) | Investigación+Docencia+innovación: plus (Idoi:plus)
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos
Palabras clave: MDD | MBD | Code-centric development | Experiment | Usefulness | Ease of use
Área/s de conocimiento: Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos
Fecha de publicación: feb-2013
Editor: Elsevier
Cita bibliográfica: Information and Software Technology. 2013, 55(2): 189-200. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.004
Resumen: Context: Today’s project managers have a myriad of methods to choose from for the development of software applications. However, they lack empirical data about the character of these methods in terms of usefulness, ease of use or compatibility, all of these being relevant variables to assess the developer’s intention to use them. Objective: To compare three methods, each following a different paradigm (Model-Driven, Model-Based and Code-Centric) with respect to their adoption potential by junior software developers engaged in the development of the business layer of a Web 2.0 application. Method: We have conducted a quasi-experiment with 26 graduate students of the University of Alicante. The application developed was a Social Network, which was organized around a fixed set of modules. Three of them, similar in complexity, were used for the experiment. Subjects were asked to use a different method for each module, and then to answer a questionnaire that gathered their perceptions during such use. Results: The results show that the Model-Driven method is regarded as the most useful, although it is also considered the least compatible with previous developers’ experiences. They also show that junior software developers feel comfortable with the use of models, and that they are likely to use them if the models are accompanied by a Model-Driven development environment. Conclusions: Despite their relatively low level of compatibility, Model-Driven development methods seem to show a great potential for adoption. That said, however, further experimentation is needed to make it possible to generalize the results to a different population, different methods, other languages and tools, different domains or different application sizes.
Patrocinador/es: This paper has been co-supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, and the University of Alicante under contracts TIN2010-15789 (SONRIA) and GRE10-23 (DISEMRIA).
ISSN: 0950-5849 (Print) | 1873-6025 (Online)
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.004
Idioma: eng
Tipo: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Revisión científica: si
Versión del editor:
Aparece en las colecciones:INV - IWAD - Artículos de Revistas
INV - Idoi: plus - Artículos de Revistas
INV - ALISoft - Artículos de Revistas

Archivos en este ítem:
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo Descripción TamañoFormato 
Thumbnail2013_Martinez_etal_IST.pdfPreprint (acceso abierto)625,86 kBAdobe PDFAbrir Vista previa
Thumbnail2013_Martinez_etal_IST-final.pdfVersión final (acceso restringido)461,68 kBAdobe PDFAbrir    Solicitar una copia

Todos los documentos en RUA están protegidos por derechos de autor. Algunos derechos reservados.