Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/115305
Título: | Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Sáinz-Ruiz, Pablo Alberto | Sanz-Valero, Javier | Gea Caballero, Vicente Antonio | Melo, Pedro | Nguyen, Tam H. | Suárez-Máximo, Juan Daniel | Martínez-Riera, José Ramón |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Salud Comunitaria (SALUD) | Salud Pública |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia |
Palabras clave: | Health assets | Salutogenesis | Dimensions | Categorical analysis |
Área/s de conocimiento: | Enfermería |
Fecha de publicación: | 27-may-2021 |
Editor: | MDPI |
Cita bibliográfica: | Sáinz-Ruiz PA, Sanz-Valero J, Gea-Caballero V, Melo P, Nguyen TH, Suárez-Máximo JD, Martínez-Riera JR. Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(11):5758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115758 |
Resumen: | Since Aaron Antonovsky’s salutogenesis theory and Morgan and Ziglio’s health assets model were first proposed, there has been a growing concern to define the resources available to the individual and the community to maintain or improve health and well-being. The aim of the present study was to identify the dimensions that characterise community assets for health. To this end, we conducted a systematised review with a meta-synthesis and content analysis of research or projects involving asset mapping in the community. Articles that met our eligibility criteria were: (1) based on the salutogenic approach and (2) described an assets mapping process and among their results, explained what, how and why particular community assets for health had been selected. The search included primary studies in the published and grey literature which were selected from websites and electronic databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Dialnet, SciELO). Of the 607 records examined by a single reviewer, 34 were included in the content analysis and 14 in the qualitative synthesis. Using an inductive process, we identified 14 dimensions with 24 categories, for which in-depth literature reviews were then carried out to define specific indicators and items. These dimensions were: utility, intention, previous use, accessibility (“circumstances–opportunity–affordability”), proximity-walkability, connectivity, intelligibility (visibility, transparency), identity (uniqueness, appropriability, attachment), design (configuration, functionality, comfort), safety (objective/subjective), diversity, the dimension of public and private, and sustainability (which includes maintenance, profitability or economic sustainability, environmental sustainability, centrality-participation and equity-inclusiveness). |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/115305 |
ISSN: | 1660-4601 |
DOI: | 10.3390/ijerph18115758 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos: | © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115758 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - SP - Artículos de Revistas INV - SALUD - Artículos de Revistas |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sainz-Ruiz_etal_2021_IntJEnvironResPublicHealth.pdf | 464,65 kB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Vista previa | |
Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons