Perfectionism Profiles and Motivation to Exercise Based on Self-Determination Theory
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10045/107267
Título: | Perfectionism Profiles and Motivation to Exercise Based on Self-Determination Theory |
---|---|
Autor/es: | Vicent, María | Sanmartín, Ricardo | Vásconez-Rubio, Oswaldo | García-Fernández, José Manuel |
Grupo/s de investigación o GITE: | Investigación en Inteligencias, Competencia Social y Educación (SOCEDU) |
Centro, Departamento o Servicio: | Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y Didáctica |
Palabras clave: | Perfectionism profiles | Perfectionistic strivings | Perfectionistic concerns | Self-determination theory | Exercise |
Área/s de conocimiento: | Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación |
Fecha de publicación: | 5-may-2020 |
Editor: | MDPI |
Cita bibliográfica: | Vicent M, Sanmartín R, Vásconez-Rubio O, García-Fernández JM. Perfectionism Profiles and Motivation to Exercise Based on Self-Determination Theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(9):3206. doi:10.3390/ijerph17093206 |
Resumen: | This study complements extant variable-centered research that focus on the relationship between perfectionism and the autonomous and controlled motivation to exercise. A person-centered approach is used for identifying perfectionism profiles as well as analyzing inter-profile differences in terms of the six regulatory styles located on the autonomy-control continuum. A sample of 597 (Mage = 22.08, SD = 3.33) Ecuadorian undergraduates enrolled in a sport science degree program was employed. Latent Profile Analysis based on two higher-order perfectionism dimensions, Perfectionistic Strivings (PS) and Perfectionistic Concerns (PC), supported a four-class solution: Non-Perfectionists (low PS and PC), Adaptive Perfectionists (high PS and low PC), Maladaptive Perfectionists (high PS and PC), and Moderate Perfectionists (moderate PS and PC). Adaptive Perfectionists obtained the highest means on Intrinsic, Integrated, and Identified regulations. However, these differences where only significant when compared with Moderate Perfectionists, and only in the case of Integrated regulation, in comparison with Non-Perfectionists. In contrast, Maladaptive Perfectionists obtained significantly higher scores on Introjected and External regulations as well as on Amotivation than the other three classes. Results are discussed in light of Self-Determination Theory. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/107267 |
ISSN: | 1661-7827 (Print) | 1660-4601 (Online) |
DOI: | 10.3390/ijerph17093206 |
Idioma: | eng |
Tipo: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Derechos: | © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Revisión científica: | si |
Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093206 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | INV - SOCEDU - Artículos de Revistas |
Archivos en este ítem:
Archivo | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vicent_etal_2020_IntJEnvironResPublicHealth.pdf | 591,99 kB | Adobe PDF | Abrir Vista previa | |
Este ítem está licenciado bajo Licencia Creative Commons