Validity and reliability of smartphone high-speed camera and Kinovea for velocity-based training measurement

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/107173
Información del item - Informació de l'item - Item information
Title: Validity and reliability of smartphone high-speed camera and Kinovea for velocity-based training measurement
Authors: Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose Manuel | Penichet-Tomás, Alfonso | Villalón-Gasch, Lamberto | Pueo, Basilio
Research Group/s: Research in Physical Education, Fitness and Performance (RIPEFAP)
Center, Department or Service: Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas
Keywords: Technology | Instrument | Video | Barbell | Half squat | Biomechanics
Knowledge Area: Educación Física y Deportiva
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Universidad de Alicante. Área de Educación Física y Deporte
Citation: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2021, 16(4), in press. doi:10.14198/jhse.2021.164.11
Abstract: The aim of this study was to validate the combination of smartphone high-speed camera and motion analysis software Kinovea methodology (SHSC-Kinovea) to measure kinematic variables of velocity-based training during back squat exercises. Fifteen athletes were voluntarily recruited for the study (age 22.8 ± 2.9 years, height 182.9 ± 8.9 cm, body mass 79.5 ± 9.6 kg). High-speed video recordings with a smartphone at 240 fps were used against a criterion linear force transducer (LPT) for measuring displacement of the barbell (RB), mean velocity (MV), maximum velocity (Vmax) and concentric phase time (CPT). The intra-class correlations coefficient between LPT and SHSC-Kinovea showed almost perfect agreement for consistency (.992, .995, .997, .993) and absolute agreement (.975, .978, .980, .964) for RB, MV, Vmax and CPT, respectively. The mean differences between instruments were 1.11 mm for RB, 0.03 m/s for MV, 0.05 m/s for Vmax and 65.91 ms for CPT, all p < .001. Bland-Altman plots showed low systematic bias ± random error for RB: 1.11 ± 1.50 cm (r2: .006), MV: 0.03 ± 0.33 m/s (r2: .001) and Vmax: 65.91 ± 63.82 m/s (r2: .11), whereas Vmax showed overestimation for the high range of measures: 0.55 ± 0.42 m/s (r2: .31). Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient showed almost perfect association between all variables: (r = .985 - .990) (p < .001). The SHSC-Kinovea methodology resulted in similar kinematic values than criterion so it can be considered as a trustworthy instrument for measuring velocity-based training.
Sponsor: This study was supported by vice-rectorate program of research and knowledge transfer for the promotion of R+D+I at the University of Alicante (Ref. GRE18-19).
URI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.164.11 | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/107173
ISSN: 1988-5202
DOI: 10.14198/jhse.2021.164.11
Language: eng
Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Rights: Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0
Peer Review: si
Publisher version: https://www.jhse.ua.es/
Appears in Collections:INV - RIPEFAP - Artículos de Revistas
Revistas - Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2021, Vol. 16, No. 4, In Press

Files in This Item:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ThumbnailJHSE_16-4_InPress_11.pdf508,96 kBAdobe PDFOpen Preview


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons